The apparent “gridwork” is due to individual images from the orbiter being stitched together.

AFAIK TED was pop science journalism’s response to the megachurch boom of the early 2000s. If organized religion could make itself over as a feel-good, aspirational lifestyle, then why not uplifting quasi-sermons about “creativity”? The reasoning, I guess, was that what’s good for Rick Warren should be good for…

Also, I personally consider the SN cars to be Fox platform even if they aren’t the 1979-93 Fox-body. The 1994-04 Mustang is the vehicle I thought you were talking about. And the DeTomaso/Qvale shared nothing but the engine with any Mustang.

It wasn’t based on ANY Mustang, period. Not the Fox or the SN Mustang.

With the exception of the Qvale Mangusta and Renntech Mercedes, none of the cars on this list would even slightly qualify as “forgotten.” Not on Jalopnik. Sorry. The mere idea that an Esprit, NSX, 928, or 911 Turbo could be “forgotten” by enthusiasts is patently absurd.

Thank you. The lack of breadth or scope is always deflating as if all these are coming from the same three-four decade knowledge bank. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose, but many of those shots, especially in the first compilation could be considered more interesting or well composed as opposed to beauti…

Congratulations! Literature is subjective and you can use it to prove whatever your agenda is if you paint with broad enough strokes. I think that’s what you were going for, and I wholeheartedly agree.

Long story short, Time Bandits has always meant a lot to me. Peter Vaughn was just one of many reasons:

The $15 minimum wage idea is nice-sounding, but fraught with peril. It will escalate the drive for large corporations to automate and eliminate labor. Smaller businesses will go away in large numbers, and what will be unseen is the number of small businesses that will never open going forward.

His screen name is Ben_Reilly1094

So throwing away long-respected journalistic principles, whereby people may tell you things they otherwise wouldn’t/couldn’t in exchange for confidentiality, is OK as long as you don’t like the guy? We’ve become a nation entirely overtaken by feelings.

I am not trying to be a jerk here, but it’s not really scenic Watkins Glen if every photo is a close crop of a car or person.

at no point do we suggest that our Sulu was ever closeted, why would he need to be? It’s just hasn’t come up before.

In some ways, it doesn’t matter. In others ways, it is a huge deal. I think their biggest problem is that they say it pays homage to Takei. That is purely marketing lip service. They ask. He rejected their point, and they ignored him. They were hoping that he would let that slide, but we know that Uncle George would…

Both of them share the same fundamental beliefs about Star Trek and Gene Roddenberry, and have come to entirely different conclusions.

I love how the first article is all about how they’re not making a big deal out of this and they hope the public can be respectful and do the same. Then the next 20 articles are about them making a big deal out of this.

You all get that Sulu is a character and Takei is real right? Cause Sulu wasn’t gay. The actor that plays him is gay. Which have nothing to do with one another. Kinda of a stupid way to ‘honor’ anyone, or support the community.

Im all for gay people. Actually Im not any more “for” them than any other person. Its 2016 and “gayness” ought not to be an issue. I know it is still an issue in some places, but I dont think that films *must* have an LGBT character in order to be relevant.

Well, this movie does need publicity since virtually nobody is dying to see it. What better way to gain that publicity than through a controversy.

Sorry, Pegg, after your comments about tossing a script for being “Too Star Treky” I don’t accept ANYTHING you have to say about the franchise.