johnjhorkleheimer11
Horkleheimer
johnjhorkleheimer11

I like how the article focuses on 29" monitors and almost no classic arcade games came with monitors that large. The only one I can think of was the cockpit version of Missile Command and they only made around 100 of those. Most classics came with 19" monitors in their upright form. 13" or 15" in minis and cocktails.

Taito made Space Invaders. Weird choice for cabinet art in any case. Using Japanese art and controls for SI and American art for Pac Man. Galaxian was the same no matter what. The generic arcade game cabinet, rather than the proper ones that the games originally wore, really takes away from the presentation. I’d

I really do not understand why you’d even ink his work. His pencils are impossibly tight. Why not just go straight to color in this day and age?

That’s not really even a television though, is it? There is no broadcast component or transmission of information. It uses a flat slotted disk to store the information. 

No they won’t. If you are in the market for a Ferrari you start to research them. Unless you are fabulously wealthy, you will put thought into this large investment and go drive a bunch. You won’t just buy one because it is “cheap”. I went and drove multiple 308 and 328s and I saw the difference in the cars that

They don’t become reliable but they become exponentially LESS reliable without regular service. People will literally not touch them without a service record for the very reasons you see presented in this article. This f355 is not a lemon, this is how they are. They are built to incredibly tight tolerances and will

Yeah but thats not the way it is. People looking for a used Ferrari will literally not buy one without service records - and often COMPLETE service records from purchase to today because the cars are literally that finicky. I am not going to say they aren’t good cars but they are not normal road cars. They are

Its total fan service with no tension and no memorable characters. I love how after the movie makes its initial flush of cash people come out and bring up the points that should have been brought up in initial reviews. Its a pattern that is repeating itself with reviews of Star Wars and Marvel films over and over.

I hate this kind of small minded BS. That’s no reason to dislike a move. There are plenty of valid reasons to dislike what Star Wars has become.

This.

We finally get a Thor that will wear the freakin helmet!

How do you know that wasn’t what she was programmed to do?

What’s funny is that the only reason anyone loves Godzilla, and probably the reason you love Godzilla, is that you grew up watching the silly, glorious spectacle of a guy in a rubber suit smashing up acres of meticulously created model cities simply to entertain YOU.

All anyone cares about is the robot and what it looks like.

Respectfully, I think you’re out of your mind regarding horsepower. Classic sports cars aren’t about speed they are about the feel and experience of driving. Not how fast you get from point A to point B but rather how much you enjoyed the space between.

Or maybe its just humility and the weight of responsibility falling onto a man’s shoulders. Why do you have to continue this pointlessly divisive behavior?

Gimme a break. Pretty much all Transformers for the last 10 years have been based on, or resembled, the 80s designs. These look no more or less like the 80s toys than the ones they are replacing.

I love when someone spends all that money to make a movie out of a property that people are interested in for decades and then pretty much completely ignores everything that made said property beloved in the first place.

Never has an artist been subject to more ridicule and persecution for practicing his craft. Shame on him for creating something so many people love.

Didn’t some media company recently get sued out of effective existence by publishing things they’re not supposed to? I remember hearing something about that. Someone should ask their advice - and then do the exact opposite.