johannesc
JohannesClimacus
johannesc

Sophomoric. Try film. you can't reproduce it with a click of a button and share it worldwide with another.

It's not where she chose to take a naked picture, it is how that makes here at least somewhat stupid. Digital photographs can be reproduced and disseminated with the touch of a button. That people - especially celebrities - continue to do so and then are shocked when such photos are made public is mind boggling. Of

Actually, no, I'm not. Who is we? You and the rest of the Skidmore WAGS department? Jesus, get over yourself.

I only accept their actions as a fact of reality. Welcome to reality. You can huff and puff about the legions of skeevy guys out there willing to do devote their lives to seeing pictures of celebrity boobs, but good luck doing anything about it. Now those people who actually bear the costs of such pictures becoming

Don't forget the ritual sacrifice of virgins.

Hmm, if you can't distinguish between the expectation of privacy in your home as compared with how you behave on the internet, I'm not sure what to say. Of course they were violated. And so are countless other women who have what they thought were private phots shared one way or the other on the Internet. Not

Perhaps its the expectation of privacy that needs to be addressed here and people should stop taking naked pictures of themselves and posting them on the internet, public or private. I know I'm teaching my daughter never to take a picture of herself naked and certainly never to share such a picture, even with a

Airplanes are owned by private corporations. You are an invitee who must pay to be in that space at the discretion of that corporation. Public spaces are places where the public has a right to go without paying to be on or in private property.

I take shits smarter than you.

They don't make accommodations for people allergic to cigarette smoke? 1. Smoking isn't allowed on flights because it is a nuisance to all people. 2. Airplanes are not "public spaces."

I mean, no, not really. The argument is that people who lack humanity use pets as an outlet for their capacity for empathy and love, which is stunted as to humans. You see how there is the common thread of empathy and love with respect to the SS and the worship of pets over humans? So perhaps you should revisit your

Godwin aside, the SS famously doted on their dogs.

I dunno, my step brother is a drug addled psychopath with little empathy for other humans. But damn does he love his dogs. I think as we become more psychologically isolated and alienated in our culture, animals are filling the void of companionship and love and humanity in our lives.

The Dog thing is out of control. Dogs on planes and subway cars. Billions spent on dog medicine. That people love their dogs so much is a sign of how alienated we are from other human beings in our culture. Nobody loved their dogs as much as the SS loved the shepherds.

I thinks she's beautiful like her grandmother. Perhaps you're just jealous of her better genes? The lottery of life can be disappointing for some.

I think it's just wealthy white women that do have children and no job but shopping and tending to the nanny that they're after. And the young women who aspire to that.

Wow, really? Let me guess, you are white and have a college education and have never been beaten severely in your life? I can assure you, you wouldn't. That's the kind of statement that makes actual feminists - who care about the plight of non-affluent women, i.e. 98% of women in the world - go crazy, and for good

You're incorrect. Try Google. Or a passable understanding of evolutionary biology.

No really, when you get the piss beat out of you and your nose and ribs broken and your vagina lacerated when you are forceably raped, it is pretty easy to quantify that suffering compared to some meek sorority girl who mutters "no" and then allows some drunk football player to rape her after getting naked with him.