No you really don’t. As I think low and high art are the essentially the same, you’ve just attempted to shove words in my mouth. I’m using things like ‘adults’ and ‘teenagers’ because they’re factually based—filmgoing up to the mid 70's swayed to ages above 25, while now data indicates the largest demographic to be…

“Or that he not only called Attack of the Clones, which is almost universally regarded as the worst star wars movie,”

Yes, because in the arts, subtext and execution is everything. It’s like attempting to say that BREEDERS (either ‘86 or mid 90's version) and INSEMINOID are the same as ALIEN, I mean they all deal with alien impregnation!

I think a flyby is appropriate for the movie in question in a more intellectual leaning publication; in their movie section then could do it for all the big releases (because, sadly, they don’t often attempt art anymore like in Hollywood’s glory heyday of the 30's-50's) and 100-200 words is a generally accepted…

Right, this is a point; the new Star Wars film shouldn’t really have a full critique in the New Yorker. It should be one of those fly by blurbs, of like 100 words.

Seriously... If you haven’t heard of half of those movies you don’t care about cinema. (much of that can be argued because about a dozen of them are 2015 movies so they’ve been around for more than 12 months).

Don’t know if the bottle part was just inserted to make the ‘extra step’ joke, but if you think LeBron went to far and it wasn’t to clown Phil Jackson on purpose (who I’ve read was seated close by and took it all in looking salty as hell), then you are kidding yourself. Of course it was too far, that was sorta the…

I was 13 when he won the Heisman, which coincided with the perfect age to love college football. The ‘Rashaan Salami’ is one of dearest memories of the era;