I would love to see Guy Pearce as Roland. But what about the rest of his Ka-tet?

Did we notice a particular glimmer of blue in his eyes? And some colouring around his neck?

This might just successfully compete with *The Core* for best worst science comprehension in a movie ever

Those two were the pairing of the decade

Relevant: https://thehardtimes.net/harddrive/stephen-king-bangs-out-winds-of-winter-on-a-tuesday-for-shits-and-giggles/

That model would explain the volcanoes in the absence of tectonic activity and the high olivine content too… you get less mafic (low olivine content) rocks when magma comes from subducting ocean plate melting up thru continental crust. No tectonics, no continental plates, all rocks end up olivine-rich.

Olivine-rich rocks form at much higher temperatures than other igneous rock such as granite. On earth we often see them at spreading ocean ridges or in rifts. Not sure what this says about the tectonics of Venus TBH.

Oh god, Logan was awesome but it made me very sad.

I agree - a good film is a good film. I think Days of Future Past might end up being Bryan Singer’s last decent film for quite some time.

I have to ask: please elaborate on “within our current technology”.

Any physics types out there able to back-of-a-napkin calculate whether you could make a breathable atmosphere out of this, as well as ocean?

FINALLY

Nice

I don’t know if that headline was meant to make me laugh as much as it did, but it did.

I think it would be refreshing for a powered character in mainstream media with issues around their perception of reality ,and suffering mental distress from childhood trauma, to be the “good guy” for once.

OK, I’ll revise that to a *possible* spoiler

the finally-actually-happening Black Widow movie

STARLORD MUSTACHE

I think they tried to give the best answer to “is Deckard a replicant?” when he said to Wallace “I know what’s real.”

Sir, I am going to turn around and read everything you have written here.