They thought nothing of it for years. This is opportunistic.  They weren’t exploited.

This was filmed in Rome and there was no exploitation. It was brief and tasteful.  

Why?

Thank You. A voice of reason.

Get back to Canada with that Grade 9 BS!

I saw it in ninth grade in upstate New York.  

Why is it wild? I saw it in ninth grade. It was a brief nude scene

Why is it bizarre?

They weren’t traumatized at the time by this event and it’s been over 40 years since they both reached the age of majority. Hope this gets thrown out of court. The criminalization of the human body is outrageous.

Stockholders only care about the next quarter, not the long term viability of a company

“may never be available to stream anywhere again”

Also, I actually considered it to be a discussion, not harassment. And I accept a Wikipedia article as prima facie evidence, but it still seems that “serving suggestion” would not serve the communication function necessary for a disclaimer anyway. But the law is not always intuitive.

The OP had talked about showing cars in commercials that contain features that are not on the base model. My point was the consumer can still get those features, they just have to pay extra. If as a consumer, you pay more for tickets for the movie with the actress, then I would be fine.

He did not provide any evidence to support his assertion on that point. When he did, I immediately admitted I was wrong on that point. However, ,y general statement still applied. Now the guy who set forth the gameplay argument has a much more strongly supported argument for why they can essentially do what I think is…

Also, Awaken, Go Forth and Die, Thunderhorse, Volcano, and Skyhunter. 

I love their albums and the full length songs.

Two D&D? I forget the second after Advanced Dungeons and Dragons

100% agree.

call in the armed squad. Beat cops should not carry guns.  

It’s OK, but I saw the ending coming a mile away.