jlfforalways
jlfforalways
jlfforalways

As a fellow Menopausal American, I’m pretty sure estrogen is not a big factor in Hillary’s day-to-day decision making.

Right? It’s almost like they’re 51% of the population and not a minority like conservative men seem to think!

I once got on a flight standby. They told me to get on the plane and take whatever seat was left. There were no seats left. The flight attendants made me get off the plane. (I was on the plane!!!) The woman working behind the desk told me that there was flight crew who were supposed to be in a jump seat who probably

Yeah, they are awful. I was 5 minutes late for checkin once due to horrendous traffic, on Christmas Eve, and they refused to make any effort to get me on the flight. I think it may not even have been a full 5 minutes. Worse, they were so blase about it. I ended up spending the night in the airport. The next day the

If they are really starting to try to do this though (which they well might be) - unless people are total sheep - they are going to get found out on social media.

yes! i would really like to see people start taking trains more and rejecting the airline industry. we would need a lot more infrastructure for this in places like the midwest, but damn, i would totally take amtrak everywhere if it didn’t take forever. i live in cincinnati. cincinnati to chicago is basically three

Oh, you would be surprised how astonishingly arbitrary things can get. The stories I could tell you. The flight crews on these planes are on a mad power trip that they are not going to get over any time soon. I almost got kicked off a Southwest flight earlier this week for asking, in a tone of desperation, not malice,

This is by who’s account? In every single experience I have had flying they would allow someone who needed assistance to board first. If that person shows up in the middle of the boarding process, they ask them to wait. I find it hard to believe, it sounds made up to get the most sympathy, if you ask me.

I can appreciate that, but this isn’t impeding their religious liberty. There are other arguments that can be made, but this is a silly one.

Why? That 100% tracks for me, and wouldn’t it be interesting if people had that option sometimes? For me the biggest difference is that a baby is usually happier with a parent no matter where they are - for many elderly people with health challenges the stress of moving around and going new places may be worse than

White feminists: “We can be anything! We can do anything! We can have a successful job and a happy family, the optimal work-life balance is in reach!

There is a strong disrespect for the work of motherhood and parenthood in this society. You can see it in feminism as well as in society as a whole. The push to hide children away and pay for someone else to raise them hurts families. It hurts them economically and emotionally. I don’t have kids but I am 100% here for

I just think of a while back when Stephen Curry had his daughter on his lap at the post-game press conference. Then, it was “So cute!” that he was “such an involved dad”. This woman has a small child, a babysitter, AND a plan in place in case of distractions, and that’s not good enough. Blergh.

How “lucky” we are to live in the West, where we have these imaginary lines drawn between “work” and “home.” Never mind that we now have companies arguing for “work-life integration,” we still must keep kids entirely out of the way lest they interrupt us.

My wife rocks the professional settings with the kid. Stays poised and cool and is more professional with it because she is compensating for the kid. I’m panicked, not because “classic goofy dad”, but just because I can’t find the way to balance it and don’t care on compensating for the kiddo at all.

It’s against feminism to pretend that you have to hide your children away because a woman’s conference must be divorced from kids and not present at all. Children make noise, but if your reaction to a baby being visible is “Get it out of here. This women’s conference about women’s lives is NOT about babies” is part of

If this is all stuff coming from employees of the brothel, I wouldn’t believe it... Isn’t it plausible they might want to blame another cause rather than deal with a lawsuit? (I’m not a lawyer but I’m guessing the ranch could be sued for something, in this day and age.)

No, it isn’t fair. Addiction isn’t anyone’s fault; it’s a disease. To blame Khloe and her family is ignorant. And Lamar signs off on the content of the show if it involves him. He gets paid for it. He’s no victim there.

She is in this predicament because of medical malpractice. She nor her personal beliefs are responsible the sheer negligence of the clinic’s staff.