Norm MacDonald had a reoccurring bit where he would always throw out “Germans love David Hasselhoff” as a non sequitur.

Yes! They didn’t have a permit for that explosion and they didn’t tell any of the neighbors, so they just did it late at night.

One of my film school professors is actually in this movie (he has the bit part as Mr. Pister) and he talked this movie up as “Orson Welles’ unfinished masterpiece” ALL the time (he was kind of name dropper “...the time I acted in Orson Welles’ unfinished masterpiece...” “...when I interviewed John Ford for his…

In California, you’re supposed to turn right “as close as possible to the right-hand curb, or the right edge of the road. “ Hardly anybody does this, and the expansion of bike lanes is making it worse (yes, you’re supposed to cut across the bike lane [when safe, obvs]).

The fact that you, random internet dude, haven’t heard of Mulaney is utterly insignificant. And in fact, Mulaney recently won an Emmy for his most recent stand up special.

Fish head soup (or some variant thereof) shows up a lot in Asian cultures. It's delicious! First of all of you didn't already know that the cheek meat is the best part of the fish, you're welcome. But you also get a really good broth from the bones and meat in the head. There's a Chinese restaurant in Berkeley that…

People’s emotions are funny. Dykstra texting him sweet nothings is not evidence that refutes allegations of emotional abuse. Just like how pointing out that Jimmy Bennett took the naked selfie with Asia Argento doesn’t refute the allegations that she groomed him for the encounter.

How are you differentiating between “lying” and “hugely fabricating?” What exactly makes those two different things? What empirical evidence do you have that she did either?

I just don’t see how anyone can keep up all the content. WWE is not helping with the Raw writing as of late either. I’ve been watching less kind of by default, they just keep making more content I don’t have time to watch. Heck, it took me three nights to get through All In.

1) this quote was written to try to get folks to empathize.

You are confusing her expectations with what you think they should be. Dykstra didn’t call for an investigation. She wanted to speak out about her experience with emotional abuse in order to gain closure for herself. She did that.

Guns like those can’t legally be sold in California, which requires fluorescent coloring. See SB199

Don’t know why my response didn’t post, but simply: that something happened does not make it “due process.” You are projecting your goals onto Dykstra. She wanted emotional closure and found the best way for herself to do it. 

Fundamentally, “due process” is a canard. It’s the application of a legal term outside of the formal legal process.

Let’s be clear: it’s the Hardwick defenders whom are clamoring for “due process.” That’s the bar that they set. If you agree that the AMC investigation does not necessarily prove guilt or innocence, I don’t think you and I have an argument. What I take issue with is anybody who wants to waive this “investigation”…

Except for the associates that resigned from Talking Dead, and the ones that spoke out publicly about his toxic behavior. I can’t seem to find the specific tweet at the moment, but a former Nerdist employee detailed an incredibly awkward photoshoot with Hardwick and Dykstra.

I don’t know how to else to say it to you to make you understand: this point has NO BEARING on what I’m saying. If you had bothered to include the rest of what I wrote in your quote, that point would have been clear.

This is true, but it doesn’t change what I’m saying. She declined to participate, in part, because she didn’t want Hardwick to lose his job.

Put yourself in Dykstra’s shoes. If a former partner of yours had been “cleared” of wrongdoing by an investigation that didn’t even interview you, the ostensible victim, would you…

Dykstra didn’t participate in that “investigation.”