No comment on its efficacy as a skin treatment, but I did receive a skin graft derived from foreskin once, for a wound that wasn’t healing. So that’s definitely a thing.

“...looking cool is like 90% of all music. It might it even be 93%.”

Sooo....they ripped off the Pax design?

I went across the bridge to see it in Oakland, and don’t regret the extra effort. Especially as the film is bookended in it. The energy in the room was palpable.

Well, Gibson got worse while Epiphone got better too.

nevermind, double post

I’m not making a judgement on the validity of Tambor’s claim. Only pointing out that he was not insisting that the claims were false on the basis of the victims coming to him personally.

You’d have to ask Tambor. My only point was to answer Kate’s question as to whether or not Tambor was dismissing the claims because “[the] victims didn’t personally have a chat with him about it”

Without making comment on anything else in your post: no, Tambor is not saying that the victims need to speak directly to him about their grievances. He’s claiming that neither he, nor Amazon, have been told what specific action(s) caused these claims. That’s quite distinct from claiming he wants the victims to talk…

I cursed too. “WTF is that?!”

He did do that, true.

Tom Delonge knows....supposedly. I still think he’s out of his mind a little bit.

OT, but it’s a crime that Night Court isn’t on a streaming service.

Reminds me of a great joke from American Dad... “You look like the most handsome man in the world, Bollywood star Akshay Kumar. Oh, did you expect me to say Ryan Gosling? I said “the world,” Steve. Get out of your Euro-centric bubble. “

You won’t quite get an 8" brim, but you can definitely find a similar styled hat with a wide, flat brim. Here’s a Stetson Amish hat, for example:

And you would be myopic for thinking so. Aside from the fact that Bernie’s campaign was engaging people who would not have otherwise voted for a Democratic candidate, there’s nothing particularly out of line with these “defectors” historically speaking. To wit, 16% of McCain supporters were former Clinton supporters…

Donna Brazile being self-serving in her book is interesting to note, but does not in fact, clear up the issue here.

Neither does pointing out merely that Bernie signed a joint fundraising agreement. The sticking point(s) are the details of said agreements.

Did you catch his interview with Edge and Christian?

He was cleared by multiple doctors (including concussion specialists), but just not by WWE’s doctor. But the (seemingly) final test which finally pushed Danielson to retire, showed a “lesion” on the brain because his tested reflexes were “a little bit slower,” but…

That wasn’t a rhetorical question. What criteria are you using to establish the harm of a given disease?

So then what’s the established criteria for delineating one from another?