I know all about it. It's bullshit. You want to stop people from joking about certain people based on their position of privilege on some postmodern critics spectrum. Sounds like fun!
I know all about it. It's bullshit. You want to stop people from joking about certain people based on their position of privilege on some postmodern critics spectrum. Sounds like fun!
You are implying that a lame joke will cause people to be murdered. Absolute madness. There is no way in the universe that this joke will kill people.
Please. Please explain how this threatens anyone. I'm dying to know.
Why is it transphobic? HOW DOES THIS HURT ANYONE.
Don't you think it would be good to stop teaching a false belief? Don't you think it would lessen everyone's fear?
What joke? It was…a non sequitur.
How does joking about them cause them to lose respect? How? We joke about white men all the time. It is NORMAL.
What would you suggest, that trans people can't be made fun of? Nobody has that privilege.
It's a joke. You cannot take jokes seriously. You cannot take jokes seriously.
You cannot take jokes seriously. You cannot take jokes seriously. You cannot take jokes seriously.
You keep telling me it's all innuendo yet I'm the one looking for crop circles? You find the article misogynistic based on your subject take on the tone? Sigh.
That is not an argument. That is a cop out.
Wut? What evidence have you provided? Zilch.
Come on. You've said the Times article was debunked and I asked for proof. You don't provide any.
There is a link to the PDF of the study in the link I sent you. It has the methodology and statistical analysis.
I would absolutely change my mind. I believed in the 1 in 5 stat for *years*. It was debunked. I had no choice but to change my mind. I used to be furious over it. For years.
It's right here. Rape and Sexual Assault Among College and Non-College Age Females 1995-2003.
Neither do yours. And you haven't presented any evidence regarding Clinton, Syria or Sanders and the DNC.
No. Wrong study.
All you have done is ad hominem. No proof.