You have my absolute empathy. I wish you well. But it doesn't mean you're right about this study. It is so flawed. And every woman I know is terrified because of it.

You called me braintrust. Turn about is fair play and all that.

Why? WHY? It's her fucking email.

Nope. It collated results from 1995 to 2003. So not quite ten years. My bad. You are comparing an online survey of two schools to a statistical analysis from nine for the period of 1995 to 2003.

I want to deny it because it wasn't fucking true. How does that make me AGAINST COMBATING RAPE?

Christ. What did you expect Sanders to say? WHY DID SHE RESIGN IF SHE WASNT CAUGHT SABOTAGING SANDERS?

Nobody put me in charge of shit. I'm acting on my conscience. Would you prefer I didn't care?

Oh Jesus. The optics were bad because she colluded against Sanders. So she resigned. How was it sexist? Because they attacked a corrupt woman? That's not sexist. That's equality. Should the press have gone easy on her? FOR SABOTAGING A MORE PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATE?

WHAT? I'm against hypocrisy. I don't care if it's from the left or right or man or women. You call me a misogynist for wanting women to be honest, for wanting leftists to be honest. I hold women as accountable as men and that makes me sexist. Invading spaces to attack women? No. I don't care who is wrong, I care that…

Prove it. Prove it has been discredited. Sent me something. Jesus.

But why? How? You say it's wrong. HOW? WHY? How can you dismiss the flawed CDC methodology?

You lose.

I already sent you the problems with the CDC methodology. Here it is again.

You've got nothing. You haven't even presented an idea.

Fine. What about the ten year long federally funded study that found that actual instances of rape/assault are 6.1 per thousand based on self-reliant and specifically addressing unreported cases? Again, the study you are clinging to was an online survey of TWO CAMPUSES. Can you in any way debunk the ten year study?

You are removed from reality. WHY DID THE CHAIR RESIGN?

Jesus. Yes, I wasn't precise. Allow me to be: 1 in 5 women are not raped or sexually assaulted. The survey—an online survey—asked general questions and the authors interpreted the results. I sent you a ten year study, not the results of an online survey based on TWO colleges surveyed.

Who cares if it's a favorite of MRAS? That's not an argument, that's guilt by association. How are the findings wrong? Specifically.

It doesn't matter. The study was flawed. Read the Time article. THE SURVEYORS INTEPRETED THE RESPONSES AS RAPE/ASSAULT, NOT THE PARTICIPANTS.

You have not presented any facts. Zero. You cannot. All you have is ad hominems. Enough.