Yeah but right now it’s just her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word, her word,…

Every red-blooded old dude loves some junk ball.

Exactly! Add to the “I’m a better feminist than you” a mix of half-baked pseudo-philosophical ideas stolen from real thinkers, thrown together and packaged for a book (hello capitalizing on feminism - particularly on the F-word). She offers nothing of substance.

Is she fucking serious? If you are married, then you cannot be a feminist? What absolute horseshit. People listen to this woman?

Crispin was all over the place in this interview and excessively pious/judgmental. She is often self-contradictory; e.g. she thinks Steinem’s criticism of women who support Bernie can’t be taken seriously because Steinem’s always had boyfriends, yet Crispin condemns the “context of investigating women’s pasts to…

It must be nice to be the only person doing feminism right.

“I live in one of the city’s safer neighborhoods, and I don’t walk my dog at night without constantly looking over my shoulder,”

I hear they want Ben Wyatt for Treasury.

Intersectionality will help you understand just how ethnicity, race, gender, and other areas intersect in ways that you might not imagine.

Found the easily offended white man.

Do you benefit in some way from that proverbial punch? Are the descendants of the one who was punched still bleeding as a result? Can you see that you’ve made a poor analogy?

And someone calling white person a Cracker, Red Neck, Hick, Limey, Peckerwood, White Trash, etc. isn’t? Again, it is subjective.

Societal power, not power of an individual. Clearly, a black billionaire has more personal power in sum than the vast majority of even well off white people.

Holy shit. So you actually think that you just made a valid historical comparison? Because there was slavery that involved white Europeans and not Americans? What exactly does that have to do with the United States? Those slaves were not made into a permanent underclass, nor was it in any way equivalent to the chattel…

The difference is the subtlety of of the messaging and willingness to accept their racism.

Breitbart, the site that boosted a white nationalist candidate and features a section dedicated to “Black Crime,” is substantively different how, exactly? There isn’t much daylight between Sean Hannity/Ron Paul-types and David Duke; Ron Paul’s newsletter regularly called black people “animals,” suggested that 95% of…

There’s a difference between Breitbart (populist/conservative) and the Daily Stormer (Neo Nazi/ White supremacist).

Absurdist Words made a great point on Twitter a while back that the coupling of sexual conquest to masculine identity is toxic because it renders a man’s identity as an adult to factors outside himself.

One does not become a man through responsibility or diligence in his professional or personal life, nor his…

Wow.