The commenter makes a good point (albeit in an annoying, insulting tone). Maybe just sit this one out?
The commenter makes a good point (albeit in an annoying, insulting tone). Maybe just sit this one out?
As a historian, so do I, although I also support quash instead of squash.
Can we ban teenagers?
Hell yes. Obviously, the pyramids were built by time-traveling NASA scientists who faked the moon landings inside there. Lee Harvey Oswald, Castro, and Charles Manson were all foremen on the project. This is indisputable! Wake up, sheeple!!
Better yet, go after alcohol.
I’m a historian, and you’re apparently a moron.
I’m not commenting on what we are, I’m commenting on what Rubio thinks those words mean. (Besides, not much.)
I know its pointless picking on modern wingnut rubes for this, but from context he means a democracy, not a republic. Of course he would use either as meaningless buzzwords, so whatever.
I think you mean golem? But maybe not? Either works.
Is it bad that I suspect he’s lying about the sexual misconduct based solely on his horrific chin slinky?
Here’s what I noticed when I spoke to people about their pot-and-parenting habits: They keep their habit hidden from their kids, even if hanging out with the kids is part of the reason they’re getting high.
I like “IC factor.” Let’s have a comparative graph of IC factor for Republican presidents and Jersey Shore characters, please.
This is a helpful article except for one thing: if you have an alcohol addiction (especially if you’re in a 12-step program) do not take a sip of their homemade booze. I cannot emphasize this strongly enough.
You need to bone up on old memes.
Uuuuuuuhhhhh [facepalm]. Now that’s a hot take.
Your comment was objectively ageist, despite any assertion to the contrary on your part. Just apologize, why don’t you?
But actually, I stand by the argument!
“Wokest baes.” Serious question. Proposition 1: “wokest bases” makes me cringe. Proposition 2: language evolves, however. Question: should we always accept without complaint its evolving towards codes and shorthand — slang? Another way to put it: it feels to me like American English is evolving towards shorter and…
I can’t tell if your comment is a clever joke on “canon” as hierarchical cultural arrangement (a canon of permissible body parts?) or a clever joke on canon law as a stifling theocratic impulse.
So, you’re going with the “great defense is the ability to mug someone” theory. Great. Great.