jizzmonkey
jizzmonkey
jizzmonkey

The point is that Sanders is a monumental hypocrite to bitch about how evil and corrupt the party is all while trying to exploit their infrastructure, money base, and voting bloc for his own gain. If the Democrats are so horrible, he should’ve remained an independent and run for POTUS as one. That he became a Democrat

they probably ran away, their open-carry weapon on the ground after falling out the the waistband of their sweat pants.

Too busy cowering in a corner because they don’t understand how fight or flight works despite claiming the know exactly how they’d react in a hypothetical active shooter situation.

Ok guns are a sensitive issue but America, you have to make it harder to get guns. There’s also no valid reason why a civilian needs a semi-automatic.

She’s not mocking prayers, she’s deriding people who offer up prayers and do nothing else. Or, to quote the scripture passage that she referenced: “Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.” (James 2:17)

God bless Sam Bee. She really is the rightful heir to the Daily Show—even if she’s doing her own show now. She’s the person who I look to now for her take on news events, who I can count on for catharsis.

Mind you:

Yes! Also, if we spend more on education and social programs, we’ll wind up with fewer criminals and less crime. But what kind of a nutjob wants that?

I can tell you’re not very smart. The point is that we spend more on keeping people in prison than we spend on education. The whole prison system needs reform. Prison is supposed to be about reforming criminals into better citizens. Too often we see the opposite effect. We see people that were imprisoned for

Not the same state, but you get the idea. Fuck this shit.

7. Fuck Rick Scott

1. US Citizen.

“The Second Amendment is under a threat like never before,” said Trump when the National Rifle Association endorsed him in May. “We’re getting rid of gun-free zones, I can tell you.”

You appear to be mistaking me for someone who gives a shit.

We’re not talking about pronouns; legal documentation already commonly uses gender neutral language when it needs to use pronouns (singular they), but avoids pronouns in almost all circumstances because they’re already inherently ambiguous.

Law changes all the time; you’re not going to convince me that it can’t handle

I have neither the time nor the inclination to further debate with you whether English can “handle” the wringer through which trans folks folks are putting it. The fact that we are talking about these concepts means we can, using this language. It will expand to hold the “new” (to you) concepts that trans folks bring

I know! This person is basically arguing that English can't change enough to handle trans folks, which is absurd. Language evolves to define concepts. Since we can talk about the concept, the language has de facto managed to describe it. End of discussion.

I still don’t hear any reason why it’s “artificial”. We had Blu-rays and HD-DVDs for a while. We used to call microwaves RadarRanges or electric ovens, before settling on the current usage. Hastags were also called pound signs until Twitter blew them up. You’re making the argument that people who are talking about

English changed a lot in the last 5 years? I’m writing the same way I did back in 2000. How the hell are you and I communicating?

Except that’s not what cisgender or transgender mean. Cis means “this side,” so cisgender is someone whose gender corresponds to the gender they were born with. Trans means “across,” so transgender is someone whose gender has changed from what their birth gender was. It’s not saying that they are not normal.