Links or it didn’t happen.

So when Israel has settlers surrounding all of their military outposts near the world’s largest open air prison, that’s not using human shields?

You just created this account today. You will not face any real-world consequences for posting anything. I can only conclude that you have no such links to post because no such videos exist.

Oh, so Israel can kill whoever it wants to so long as “it’s not their mission”. Who cares if Israel “accidentally” kills thousands? Because Israeli officials claim that Hamas “deliberately” targets civilians. And we should just believe them.

Post a link

Military targets? Really? They have bombed schools, hospitals, churches. Unicef has lost connection with it’s personel, many UN officials died.

I defy you to provide proof that anything you mentioned actually happened. Show me the proof of women being raped. Show me the proof of babies being torn from their mothers wombs. Why can we take Israel at its word but not the Gazan health ministry?

Please explain to me how Hamas are terrorists for killing civilians but the IDF aren’t. Because the IDF has already killed literally thousands of civilians in their bombing of Gaza. Why aren’t they terrorists, too?

Do you happen to have any idea how many Palestinian children are currently in Israeli custody? (hint: it’s at least one order of magnitude higher than the number of children currently being held by Hamas.)

What makes Hamas’ killing of civilians any more terroristic than the IDF’s? Because the IDF has already killed well over 3,000 children since October 7th.Why can they kill civilians but Hamas can’t?

People in these comments are so worried if Hamas earned the Terrorist Organization name yet, while nobody dares call the Terrorist State of Israel by its full name. If we’re going by the count of bombings, hostage taking, torture, mass shootings, global propaganda production, or any other metric, the terrorist state…

Are you also keeping score regarding all the innocent people Israel has killed?

How many times are you gong to post this lazy, uninteresting, uninformed take? FFS

Because most stand-up comedians aren’t attempting to clout-up and parlay that into being the face for certain movements OR, if they do, they’re open about the fact that they’re making up details.

Also most don’t doxx people in their stories, lie to their partners about it, and implicate serious shit like how anthrax…

For humor? Yes. I don’t think Eddie Murphy’s mother could really throw her shoe like a boomerang and take him out from two rooms away. But Minhaj saying his daughter ended up in the hospital because someone sent an envelope of Anthrax to his home was not an effort to heighten the comedy.

Yeah, I think the issue here is that most people expect a stand-up act to be embellished for the purpose of making it funnier, not to increase empathy for the speaker (except to the extent that it helps with the former goal) or as an attempt to offer critiques of real issues like racism and xenophobia.

I don’t really…

This is an idiotic take.

They don’t have any writers working for them anymore. They fired them a couple years back. Now they have “content” creators and AI-created articles.

If your opinion is Scorsese is overrated and Marvel films are actually more important to film history, you shouldn’t be writing about film. And I say that as someone who…

Okay, let’s talk about the attack. Why did the Netanyahu gov’t ignore intelligence warning from both Egypt and the United States about the impending attack? 

Most incredibly, there was no article written about the actual terrorist attack by Hamas. How is that possible? It’s Israel’s version of 9/11 and you don’t even see fit to do an article about it? That’s basically Fox News level journalistic malpractice.