Anyone else read the headline as “Tony Montana Firm Suspiciously Scores...” and think that it made perfect sense?

If you’re using structured light (from a battery powered device, no less), it is not possible to not be seen as “racist” unless you intentionally degrade the performance of your system for some users to make it fair.

I read Hellblazer for years and can only recall a tenuous reference to bisexuality in one early issue. I don’t think it was ever a major issue. (Been years though.)

The reason you find this so ridiculous is because you will never be in a situation where a man could accuse you of any inappropriate behaviour without being laughed at, safe of you literally ripping his clothes off. You will never be accused of ‘eye raping’, making a man ‘uncomfortable’, ‘sexist’ jokes, ‘accidentally…

The Mouse gets what the Mouse wants.

The person’s argument is that if the subject of the statue can’t pass modern scrutiny, it should be taken down. I provided context around some of the more memorialized people in US history. None of them would pass modern scrutiny. I am explaining that such a stance would cause statues to cease to exist as humans…

There is a narrative here and it must be adhered to.

That’s a bad metric unless you are anti-statue in general. MLK was a misogynist who cheated on his wife. Same with JFK. FDR was a bigot by modern day terms. Same with Teddy Roosevelt. Lincoln was a white supremacist. The founding Fathers were slave owners. We got to the moon first on the back of Nazis. Most people of…

As is the idea that removing statuary that is ignored 99.999999999% of the time is the civil rights cause of our time.

Yeah, I’m not really clear on why this is acceptable.

hes Korean not Japanese they don’t all look the same sheesh

Agreed, men are assholes and I’m one. I have no issue with the content just not a lifehack. Gawker has 1, 000 other sites this could have gone on

It’s a feedback loop. They can call someone for mansplaining and if the man does ANYTHING other than politely accept the accusation, they are then further guilty of mansplaining. It’s a tactic to control the interaction. The example above is simply patronizing condescension and happens all the time to men/women by men…

I am a male engineer who works with plenty of other male engineers and a few female engineers. Lots of people do this, it’s not exclusively something men do to women. Actually I mostly get it from sales people, they have the sort of ego and drive that has them talking over people a lot. It’s not particularly sexist,…

Dear Lifehacker,

If this had been about women posting pictures that show them from the shoulders down because “no one wants to be surprised by a big girl and she should own it” can you imagine the rage train that would rip through here?

I liked that because they were both right and wrong in that scenario. Danny couldn’t relate to someone who was poor and Luke didn’t remotely get the gravity of the situation he was walking into and what the Hand was

You get out of here with your terrible Karen opinions. She wasn’t given much to do in The Defenders—like most of the casts of the others shows—but on Daredevil she’s great.

If it’s unpopular, I still agree with you.

Really? I loved the banter between Luke and Danny. It felt earned and real and the chemistry between Jones and Colter worked.