If you think facts will win more Americans over than personal attacks, I have to wonder which of you in your marriage is in it for the immigration status.
If you think facts will win more Americans over than personal attacks, I have to wonder which of you in your marriage is in it for the immigration status.
Given her social, political, and financial status, the chances of her “being carted off to jail” even for the most egregious of crimes is very low.
Way too many people in this world operate on such a principal. It’s like how some people act like if you criticize a victim in any way whatsoever you are saying that the defendant is innocent.
If this is what yu believe then you are in the wrong place. As an example look at any article on this site about a man harming a woman who turned him down. You will find many, many people using those isolated incidents to rationalize their fear of all men.
I know, from my own experience that drunk white guys and girls can say and do racist crap.
Probs because Rapp said some pro pedo things on her twitter, which gg sent to Walton to get her on board. So now you want to talk to her, because she’s involved in something video game related.
No, she’s catching shit because she was really vicious toward some of the people who were mad about the censorship. They weren’t mad at her, they were mad that something they were passionate about was being censored. She came in and started being a real dick to fans of her company, and then the internet reacted with…
I think we’re in fact referring to two different groups of people.
Child Porn ... not “Characters”
This article does a fantastic job of trying to force any discussion of censorship into 1 of two camps, turbo harassment neck-beards or the enlightened ones. I dont think that was specifically your goal but its definitely the tone of the article.
Except that everything they said turned out to be true and all the science they practiced actually worked. Except for that they were frauds?
Yeah, I just edited in something saying that the original Ghostbusters is where the finger of blame should put, not this one, which is clearly just directly mirroring the original’s characters without too much change.
Which is even funnier when you hear Ernie Hudson talk about how the studio relegated his character into that role when originally he was supposed to also be a scientist and much more prominent.
LOL, “scientists.”
It’s a somewhat odd controversy considering that Winston Zeddemore, the character played by Ernie Hudson in the original films, becomes a Ghostbuster without having any scientific background and just having answered a classified ad. He even says in the movie when asked if he believes in the paranormal “If there’s a…
It could be that she’s irresponsible, but it could also be that she has access to materials and programs through her phone that she doesn’t have through the district’s technology. I have a friend who lets her students use one of her personal computers in her classroom because, sadly, her computer is a lot more…
NOW I haz it - forgive this for how it’s going to sound but: domestic violence seems ubiquitous no matter which economic class women find themselves in (oh, ick). By that I mean, it exists, and is studied. I think (IMO) gentrification is less observed and studied, especially from a feminist viewpoint. AND studying…
Here’s my moment of self-promotion. I promise I won’t do it again: