the worst thing you could do for women’s rights is to hide behind them. just because Hillary is a woman, doesn't mean she can't be a horrible candidate.

I honestly believe that his channel is the whole reason Battlefield went to the World War I in the first place. Someone on the development team had been watching those videos for a while and said, “We could totally do this. He makes it seem actually way more interesting than history class.” I was actually surprised by…

Is it just me, or is Corpse Run not even attempting a joke this week? Like, I get it, most of us don’t think the game is that great. But it’s not really all that humorous to just read a list of things someone dislikes about it in comic form. I've already seen it all in reviews and comments.

Furries everywhere, and it’s up to a headstrong fox and a smart rabbit to save the day. But enough about Zootopia.

Glad to see this site is full of chickenshits who don't care at all about half a million dead brown people abroad, the mass incarceration of minorities at home, and the rampant abuses of Wall St. Don't worry, you'll get the REAL victory, which is a woman president!

SS’s statement about HRC being a republican was not a “fact” it as obvious hyperbole. As established, if you think she was being sincere then there’s no helping you.

I hear her. I’m a female Bernie supporter and I’m tired of bernie supporters being talked about like we (female supporters) don’t exist. I’m not a “Bernie bro”, nor am I sexist, and I care about civil liberties, just like Sanders.

“This is where things become dicey, because it means that some people make money by covering the embarrassing, potentially untrue private details of other people”

Like what Gawker does?

1) picked a completely innocent woman to blame for not getting their anime titties

Okay but what’s Gawker’s obligation?

Too Late To Edit Addition: I’m not going to engage in the specific people but for all the deservedly grey comments out there whining about her college paper, I will simply say this:

This story has been a mess and a minefield, one that raises questions about the best ways to report on harassment while providing readers as full a picture as possible.

If there’s a conversation about whether or not something was racist, it was a dumb thing for a politician in the middle of a presidential campaign to say.

Fahey, can you please nuke MortyMan33's comment from orbit? It’s not relevant to any discussion here, and serves only to start a gamergate flame war & slander people.

Your semantic argument doesn’t manifest reality. Either your right to vote matters (notes hand wringing about voting rights that might be lost under a Republican administration) or it doesn’t (cue insistance that voting for a 3rd party candidate is meaningless “sabotage.”)

So are mine. And people are actually living in abject poverty today. Right now. 40% of Americans are being told, as they have been told for decades, that they must suffer the roll back of the social saftey net, wait in over crowded prisons, be denied health care or jobs that can pay living wages, because “good…

Others have already pointed out the difference between the prison-industrial complex and this specific case, so I won’t repeat that.

Those four considerations are the philosophical basis of criminal punishment. You saying “I don’t get it?” again and again doesn’t make it invalid or even confusing, it means that you look uninformed.

“...we as a nation...”