jesse13927
Jesse in Japan
jesse13927

He probably did have enough money to do what he wants and sustain his family. Could you possibly explain to me when and how I said that he didn't? Could you also explain why you believe that he was rich? Also, you do realize that a person can be "not rich" without being "poor," right? When I say he probably wasn't

I don't really like Hollywood movies. I like Korean movies and I wish that American audiences were willing to watch Korean movies as they are instead of trying to get Korean filmmakers to make Hollywood movies, which are almost always inferior. That's what I meant. For me, an international director who is hired to

Is sarcasm really that hard for people to read on the Internet?

So what's your point, then? Keeping in mind that I never said anything to the effect that he couldn't afford it.

If only we lived in a world where they could just make the movies in Korea (in Korean) and have them show on theaters in the US with subtitles...

The ones on who? What are you talking about?

Happiness is great. It makes the rest of Miike's films look normal. And it's not so violent that you'll have to worry about your more squeamish friends passing out, like Audition or Ichi the Killer.

I believe that self criticism needs to be constructive self criticism. The realization of what you're doing wrong has to link into possibilities and ways to do things right.

Simple is best. And good design in unobtrusive. And the change holder is probably the only entry that is something that somebody might actually use.

Are those real cell phones? The ones in the center look kind of fake.

A Takashi Miike film in which only the last 15 minutes don't make sense is not bad, in my opinion. Not making sense is what made Happiness of the Katakuris so great.

I know what you mean (and I know for a fact I'm not getting anything), but there is always the possessions and personal effects. I think a collection of porn (or a collection of decorative plates or commemorative anything, for that matter) would be kind of awkward to stumble upon. You just don't quite know what to do

Why include the detail about the "boxed" macaroni and cheese and not include the brand? The brand makes a huge difference in determining whether he's really into you or if it's just that he's kind of high right now.

This is also why retailers are always so desperate to have you buy accessories with your new Apple product.

I am saying it is awkward for his family and that that is an unavoidable fact of life. You are reading the words poor and afford into places where I have not said them. Are you familiar with psychological projection?

The article is very clear that he does have children. If he didn't have children, it wouldn't be an issue. It doesn't matter whether or not he was poor. Unless he was super rich, we're talking about a big chunk of money. It was a big chunk of money for an average person to spend on anything, porn or not.

I was saying that porn is not like video games. Imagine that you have a thousand of your dead father's porn DVDs that you have to dispose of. That's an awkward situation.

It doesn't matter if he's poor. That's a pretty big chunk of inheritance, either way.

I never said anything about the father's rights. I said that it would be "awkward."

I didn't say it was their first concern. But you're kidding yourself if you don't think that the little matter of the estate would come up.