jeromeanderson
Ogre
jeromeanderson

Rape! Such a taboo subject! Don't laugh! He said rape! Oh noes! Rape!

Hey, here's a joke:
Someone who types for a living is called a typist.
What do you call someone who raps for a living?
A MINORITY!

Brought to you by your local friendly not-a-stick-in-the-mud rape and sexual assault survivor and minority.

Somehow Consentacle makes sex sound boring. That's utterly amazing.

I can't wait to play this game, just so I can enjoy the vicarious hand-wringing and moral panic. Good fucking job, DC. I tip my hat to you. If people want Gone Home, give it to 'em, so long as this gets an equal standing.

Waah? Relationships should be gamified, because that's how the real world works. There are penalties and rewards for your actions. Sure, you may wanna gussy it up and act like the pig is wearing a goddamn dress, but that's how it works. Let's say you are a selfish prat: if all you do is take, your rwarding

Well, growth is absolutely necessary for a good character arc. Fundamental, even. That's why I think the blasting the notion of the damsel in distress literary convention is such a bad idea, mostly because it only fails if you take it literally, which it's not supposed to be. I mean, most seniors in high school

I could only be more happy if a Skies of Arcadia sequel was announced. Or an HD remake of Xenogears.

That first statement doesn't ring true with me, but that may be because I'm not female. She grew as a person, as someone who is capable and dangerous. Those traits are universal, not specific to female, I think. Then again, it's similar with male characters. They become...more...clever, smart, dangerous, whatever.

My comment! Literally FIRST FUCKING SENTENCE: "Other characters in Marvel Heroes that have also been mass murderers:" And, yes, the article made the most oblique fucking reference to other characters, but the goddamn article is, as the headline states about a PARTICULAR FUCKING CHARACTER being introduced to a

I thought the whole point of the first arc of TR was that Lara was helpless, but being helpless, being weak and scared, didn't stop her. She fought against the hopelessness of the situation. She did not embrace being a victim, which you would think would be a very feminist thing to portray, but without victimhood,

Are you always retarded, or just especially when you are wrong? Or maybe English isn't your first language and you have some trouble with reading comprehension?

If you can't wrap your head around how this was a discussion about people who are murderers on a large scale that are also a part of the fucking game in

That's a funny way of spelling, "I don't know anything about the game or the context of the discussion, but I'm going to butt in anyway and not provide anything of note."

Interchangeability is not an issue, but would the loud "feminist" voices really be quelled if every game had an either/or option? I honestly don't think they would, but I don't have a particularly high opinion of their ability to know what they want, nor of their ability to be satisfied. And as for what's wrong with

Only two words can describe my first character: clown hooker.

Well, thank you, then.

I never know now if people are using bro as term of sincerity or sarcasm.

She did it under two different influences, the first of the Phoenix, the second of Mastermind. Hooray for Dark Phoenix. Wanda's was a self-willed act because she got tired of the conflicts around here, which she viewed as the fault of the mutants (because of dear old dad's enemies).

I think you are overstating the importance of Lilith, as she pretty much deferred to Roland, who actually had experience leading people. Also, I'd say all of the characters were pretty well developed equally, at least as far as the four original characters go. Further more, I can't really say that that "any BioWare

Also not Marvel, but sure.

Leaders often don't "actively participate" but he lead the Marauders, and suffering doesn't erase what he did, atonement isn't a one-time action. You can think it's unfair, but I'm not changing my opinion because innocents died as a result of his actions which lead to him putting them in direct danger. It's not like

The only reason I say he's not is because Galactus is a universal force for balance. He's necessary. *shrug*