Maybe I could understand what he did a LITTLE more if he had done it for the reason of wanting to quit youtube and tf2 without having people resent him

I did read it. Many times. You are inferring the context of what he is saying. No, he never specifically said he wanted to kill a random person. He could mean that. But he also could mean that he specifically hoped to bump into the guy that attacked his friend. Claiming his quote specifically is saying he just wanted…

No, he didn’t literally say that. Where did he say specifically a random person? What he said was missing key detail, I agree, but claiming his comments are specifically racist (as this article is doing) is jumping to a conclusion.

No, are you? I’m reading what he wrote and explaining how his word choice leaves much to be desired - nowhere in what he said is he specifically stating his goal was just to kill any random person of a specific race.

Neither have you. You are presuming that some means any. But that’s not what he’s saying. You are reading it that way, I’m reading it to mean a specific person that he hopes to bump into.

He never expected to find the rapist.

Seeking to kill any random black man because your friend was allegedly raped by a specific black man isn’t revenge.

Neeson clearly wanted to kill THE rapist. It’s not that he just wants to kill any person - in his mind he likely would convince himself that this random “black bastard” that wanted to fight him would also somehow be revealed to be the person that also attacked his friend.

He never says he wants to kill “black bastards” - he specially was hoping to run into the specific bastard for which he only knew was was a black man.

Let me ask you this: Do you think he would have done this if a white man raped his friend?

DuckTales: Remastered was released long before the Reboot was ever announced and sold a lot better than was predicted.

And my Prey example was merely illustrative of how a name may be used by its owner regardless of actual connection with previous titles with the same name. You read a little too much in that.

Except they don’t if the argument is that Accolade only ever had a licensing agreement. I don’t know why so many people are having difficulty understanding this. The countersuit filed back in February of last year by Ford and Reiche aims to invalidate Stardock’s trademark.

Everyone agrees Stardock has the rights to the “Star Control” trademark.

The “established” IP was defunct

Thats pretty unfair to Stardock.

No, it’s a spiritual successor but still being branded based on the established IP. It should have been called something else and all these problems would have been avoided.

So the fact that the general gameplay is very much similar to the originals means nothing to you?

...something the physical copy of a game can ship with.

You can play games without non-critical patches if the developer/Platform holder allow you to, yes. But if the patch is considered critical by either of them, you will be stopped in your tracks and asked to download and install the latest patch before playing the game.