If they fired their CEO, it would solve a lot of the problems Tesla is facing.

Calling out shoddy equipment isn’t wishing doom on his fellow countrymen, it’s calling on Mr. $56 billion to make sure his stuff works like it’s supposed to...

His political views are disgusting.  To call them “quarrels”, get fucked.

Sure, Tesla employs people. Sure, they were important to getting the EV movement started. But at this point they’ve gotten so complacent and listen to so many of Musk’s bad ideas that they need to be called out on it.

Doesn’t explain the “warranty void” and the water ingress.

You can’t get it wet? I’m sure this has been said before but is it a gremlin?

Sheesh! You have to put it in a special mode for it to cope with a fucking car wash? And if not, warranty is voided! What a fucking shitshow of a design and company.

I would argue that Winter Solider is where Marvel showed they could successfully shift their formula into broader genres, and then almost immediately abandoned that

Winter Soldier is SO good and watching it in-time with Agents of SHIELD was a truly wild ride. That shift was also incredible.

That does come up, if only in passing, when they’re arguing about the Accords immediately after Ross’s presentation. Rhodey argues that the UN isn’t the World Security Council, or SHIELD, or Hydra, and Steve answers that it’s still a group of people with agendas, who may send them where they don’t want to go or keep…

What’s the excuse for not having a legitimate bounty system, especially for a live service?

Rule #1: Moffat lies. 

This seems fine. Moffat wrote some very good episodes but was a terrible show runner. Popping back in to do the thing that he did well makes sense.

Steven Moffat is returning to Doctor Who...

Because customers are asking for it?

the lead isnt necessary. many other companies have similar designs without needing lead. 

You forgot “Don’t advertise at all”

Step 1: Release VR headset at an exorbitant asking price.

Stick with me here... The malice isn’t in the intent, but in the ignorance of the assumption.

I believe the topic in question is that this app is a national security risk, so I don’t see how “tik tok should exist because of the funny memes” is a relevant defense against that.