Yes.

Sigh. In California, at least, employers are required to disclose to an employee anything that goes into their personnel file. If a complaint is made about you that prompts investigation, they would have to put that in there. So they’d have to tell him. Regardless, as you can see from my statement ‘it’s literally…

It’s literally currently happening. So, it is true. I’m glad you’re determined to be right because you’ll maybe be a cop someday though. You definitely have investigated tons of large-scale rape cases.

I truly don’t see the significance of tipping him off. Who cares. What evidence was he going to get rid of, if they took his car away. Nothing, there was literally nothing for him to destroy — the dna on his fly ended up being inconsequential. I realize that’s hindsight, but it’s a lot more dangerous to let him stay…

If the department is investigating an employee the employee is informed of it. And he’s a lot more likely to sabotage evidence if he’s allowed to keep toolin’ around in the cop car, which contains the evidence. Get him out of the car. There was no evidence that I am aware of that was in his personal possession — it’s…

I would imagine that they have a policy to remove officers under investigation for physically harmful misconduct from active duty and either place them on leave or in an office position until investigation is complete. They violated this by letting him continue to interact with the public — I think this could be…

Proper procedure would be to remove him from active duty pending investigation — he doesn’t necessarily need to be put on leave, but could be given an office position until the investigation was complete.

Yeah, $75k is shockingly low, I’m truly surprised this case even made it to filing... if that’s what she’s asking for, give it to her! I practice employment law and that’s lower than any award I have ever sought... and that’s for being fired, not being raped.

the bottom of the tattoo was photographed under his shirt 5 months ago, which is referenced in the US Weekly article

It is 100% not Constitutional

Thanks!

That’s pretty mind-blowing! I might need to do some research, because I would be ASTOUNDED if that’s actually been put into practice in the past decade or more... I do remember in law school reading a CA federal case that held it to be unconstitutional, so I’d imagine, at least in CA, if it’s on the books that’s just…

I think they were crying. Which... is fine. It’s not his family’s fault he’s a monster.

That would be incredibly unconstitutional

I am very curious what Selma Blair was actually reacting to... sort of a thumbs up that seems genuinely supportive mixed with a look of ‘that must have been so hard for you...’ I can truly not imagine a statement where those two actions in combo would be my reaction

I don’t see any posts yet about how disturbing the presence of identical twins here is... do we think they’ll date together? Some sort of Ashley-and-Lauren-Iaconetti situation (if one stays both stay)? It just... is very upsetting.

This is becoming “a thing” on this show... I actually think coming back on for a second season is ok, because ostensibly they went into the first season not knowing who the Bachelor was, so it’s not like they went on the show the first time “for that guy,” rather they just went on a dating show, and now know Ben and…

Oh my god you are a genius

DID SHE SAY THAT HER CHAIR WAS COVERED WITH THE FUR OF AN ESKIMO PUPPY? This woman is a monster.

I think she looks like Caitlyn with her face taped back like that?