jehovasblitzness
Jehovah's Blitzness
jehovasblitzness

If you honestly believe that asking for resignation is not a professional courtesy born from someone being nice, then the only useful advice is to always say, "Fuck you, pay me." If you're right, then requesting resignation is just a cost avoidance strategy, and you can never negotiate more than what you'd get if you

Do you think these decisions are made by an algorithm? There is a person (or people) making the headcount reduction decision.

Companies don't ask for resignations; people ask for resignations. Being "nice" is a big part of that psychology, especially when there's guilt involved in the decision. Regardless of how evil, greedy, or piggish "the company" is, there's still a person—who is probably not a sociopath—actually pulling the trigger.

Soccer doesn't really fall in the same boat: there's lower injury risk and a greater emphasis on form and fitness. There's also a lot of benefit from the additional training, and the events themelves (specifically the World Cup and Euro) are so much larger than international competition in other sports, including

I want to meet the 4.1 - 6.9% of Lacrosse Bros who are lying through their fucking teeth about not drinking.

Look, numbskull, let me explain this in simple terms:

A video in the elevator exists.

This is a great read until a very, very stupid conclusion:

#NotAllHannaBarberaCharacters

Beating up their fiancees.

18 Overrated Will Gordon Posts

That would only work as long as they kept their hand out of the Origin cookie jar.

So, like, until their next release.

[Because trophy wives do not deserve respect just by virtue of them being trophy wives. He decides when women deserve respect. Not you. Better get that straight now!]

If that's the case, then the NFL, in its statement, could have highlighted that this was the maximum suspension under the CBA, and expressed regret at that fact. Instead, the statement read like Goodell was puffing up his chest and bragging at how strong of a disciplinarian he is.

I didn't say it wasn't valid, but citing this in favor of CrossFit is puffery. This research suggests CrossFit is exercise; it doesn't suggest CrossFit is The Best Exercise Ever Made For Everybody, as CrossFit brands so desperately.

Nonsense. If the sample is to small too assess the injury risk, it's definitely too small to support the performance conclusion, considering 16% of the small sample size couldn't complete the study.

Do some research (especially with your insurance company) and find a qualified personal trainer and/or physical therapist who has experience specifically with back injuries. In most cases, "permanently fucked up" really means "in need of professional attention." You probably have weakness in the stabilizing muscles,

CrossFit trainers might be great trainers, but CrossFit's model is a terrible model for teaching, learning, and perfecting technique. Unless you've got one trainer per participant and trainers are willing to interrupt the "high intensity" gospel of the workout to teach technique, all they're doing is coaching you to

The study didn't even compare the results to non-CrossFit workouts. It was basically a puff piece, except that people actually got hurt by CrossFit.

If you're concerned about doing Olympic lifts with bad form, why are you going to CrossFit for trainer supervision?