I thought this one was a big let down. All they had to do was break from the other logos and just show a portrait of Edgar Allan Poe and it would have been hilarious.

Then why are you even talking, man?

How about you save your indignation for things that matter? I can count the amount of pedestrians killed by cyclists in recent memory on one hand. Maybe you should focus on the cars that kill pedestrians every 2 hours in America...or the 60,000+ severely injured every year by cars?

Can you back up your personal experience with data? Because most data available in the United States is contrary to your claims, which also happen to be irrelevant to the conversation.

I think you meant to direct this at the dude talking about driving cars, and not me, the cyclist/pedestrian, but amen.

And they're also designed for bicycles, as you yourself stated above. Bikes can operate on the road, according to the laws you agreed to follow when obtaining your driver's license.

Yea, well fuck you too in your car taking up space.

I'd like to get a little background on your experience in these situations. When was the last time you were on a highway with your family surrounded by 100 aggressive motorcyclists who may be carrying themselves and successfully defused the situation by drawing your concealed carry weapon and firing on the…

I don't really think taxes are out of control in Maryland. It's hard to fault the state for a stormwater management fee when it's required by the feds, but I guess it's easier to blame democrats than use logic.

With you up to the socialist propaganda crap. Though I guess I technically agree with you—folks should have to pay a tax per miles driven in my opinion, in lieu of toll roads.

But anyone can post a pretty photo of a city and make similar claims that apply to them.

I think guys like Adam because he's the only male character that isn't just a foil for one of the other girls. I like Adam's character and so does my roommate; this episode made both of us uncomfortable. I like Darth Vader as a character too, but don't take that as a red flag that I'm a genocidal maniac who's going to…

I'm not going to question it. I think it's fine for people to have doubts, but running around yelling that he's a murderer when one has no evidence is just immature and pointless.

No, but I believe calling someone guilty after the justice system has determined otherwise is wrong.

What's your evidence that it wasn't correct in this case? They didn't even have evidence to charge, let alone convict. The only corruption and lack of oversight was grandstanding by attorneys trying to make a name for themselves through a famous case.

Didn't realize you were the go-to person to determine when justice is flawed. Now I know.

What facts do you know that police and attorneys didn't have? Of course he wasn't tried for murder—because they had no evidence.

It should also be noted he didn't murder anybody. Justice system and all that.

That's a fair point, and like I said, I'd love to see a real legal challenge here. My main argument in this thread wasn't with that intriguing legal dilemma, but the fact that taking the photos is, in fact, perfectly legal without permission from the subjects, no matter how wrong one thinks it is. That's what people…

If the photographer isn't profiting from that traffic I don't think the argument can be made they have produced the work for a commercial purpose. I'm sure someone could challenge the law with this line of argument, but as it stands it is legal. I'm not saying it's moral/ethical/right.