jedimario
jedimario
jedimario

So true, a lot of people would see marked improvement if they always made sure the sun was behind them.

If you're like most people, you have knees and they bend. Use this feature. You are not restricted to eye-level point of view. You can even lay all the way down or find a way to elevate yourself. The most boring albums from shows that I see are the ones where the photographer took every single picture from the

Will the UAW be able to make any money in TN? 4.8% of the state was unionized in 2012. I'd bet the percentage of unionized auto workers is even lower.

I don't think it'd cheapen the brand if it had a carbon fiber monocoque and other features typical of modern supercars. But it would end up prohibitively expensive with all of those features...I just don't see a big enough market to justify it. I think most of the takers would be die-hard McLaren fans that can't

I thought the show was the academy. So, don't most of the people that get on the show have prior experience?

Don't most of these guys/gals enter the "academy" with prior driving experience (which in turn made them better at GT)?

Despite today's "Answers of the Day", each and every one of these:

Sounds like you got a good deal. It happens. I have a friend who works at a dealer that got a non-running E90 325 on a trade-in. The service department said it had a "blown motor" and he bought it from the dealer for $3000. $600 in parts and some work on the fuel pump later the blown motor is running just fine and

Where are you guys seeing driving E30s with any motor for less than $1000?

And looking at the PDK acronym, something like this may not even be 4 words.

Is TDFI even an English acronym?

The blunder is that our society liked it, not that Chrysler's PR firm played us perfectly.

I dish it out where it's deserved. Help me find the baseless and speculative argument, though.

"The older ones with real autos are worse sports cars than their manually equipped counterparts, yes." I say that based on real world experience and the monetary values of the manuals vs autos that you typically see today.

The older ones with real autos are worse sports cars than their manually equipped counterparts, yes. I'm not picking nits, there are SUBSTANTIAL differences between dual clutches and automatics. And sure, modern automatics are way better than old ones. But guess what? Modern manuals and dual clutches are way

The GC serves its purpose, true. But, fun fact: you COULD afford to maintain a Boxster, it's not expensive.

The steering is such a big part of what makes a sports car enjoyable. I own and periodically daily drive a 986 Boxster, so maybe I am just spoiled in terms of steering feel, but the car in general is not a difficult thing to live with.

No, you're not correct. I'm well aware that modern Camaros and Mustangs do well in all types of "sporty" driving. And I am comparing the Genesis to the FR-S/BRZ, 370, Mustang, etc...note the "et all" in my last post.

Ferraris and Lamborghinis don't use automatics, they use dual clutch gearboxes. These are not the

You said it yourself- "The steering is direct and weighted nicely (though some may find it heavy), but doesn't provide much feedback, and not as sharp as the FR-S I test drove." I didn't believe that it literally felt like a Sonata- the guy in the video was pretty clearly explaining how it reminded him more of that

The FR-S interior is horribly cheap, yes. I don't know about the quality on the Mustang or Camaro, but I do know that I can't stand to look at the Camaro's. Tell me about how the car "comes alive" though. What type of driving are you doing when you "open it up"? This is where everything I've seen indicates that

I'll drive anything someone will hand me the keys to. I've read that the car is disconnected and too appliance-like. I believe the phrase was a 2-door RWD Sonata. What other cars do you have experience with to compare it to?