jcantwell82
DaLogarithm
jcantwell82

Agreed, Littlefinger clearly looked at Sansa when she said the raped in way that showed he didn’t think that’s the way it actually happened, but decided not to reveal the truth to her.

It’s a draft day miracle!! (even though it happened a few months ago...)

It’s not turning a 6” screen into a 27”. It’s a portable computer that happens to have a 6” screen attached to it , so this screen get this resolution and this experience, such as touch, larger icons, etc. Hey, you are at your monitor, and you get to set it to either automatically pair, ask if you want to pair, or you

Power goes out, well, that’s why it’s on battery. PC has to update? Do it overnight. It goes down? Well, you use your older version, just like you do if your cell phone goes belly up until you can replace/repair it. No where does it say you only have to use one device, or take away your ability to have a back-up

If your phone was as powerful as your gaming PC, then I think most people would love having one device for everything. We aren’t there with the hardware yet, but the software has to be put in place and be developed along side it so the possible future where one device is possible, the software is able to handle that

Typical move when a man has trouble scoring, just roofieing your way in.

Yeah, I think if you took engineering, you would disagree college was easier than high school. I did nothing in high school with all advanced classes and it was a joke. Freshman year of engineering school was hell. Adding up our hours, we figured out we were in class 30+ hours per week. We shitted on (envied) all the

Exactly on the efficiency aspect.

Oh, no, I'm not saying it is legal, it is completely illegal. I'm saying illegally obtained evidence, IE evidence infringing upon your rights, cannot be used against you. It can be used against someone else, since it did not infringe upon their rights. But since your rights were infringed upon, you can sue. So from my

Yes, but case law also provides you to sue the police department for money damages due to illegal search and seizure. It is handled like an injury case, so you can sue for monetary losses as well as other losses and attorney's fees.

Oh, I don't disagree it's wholly stupid, but I think the thing that prevents that is that if they do find anything against you, they can't use it, so what's the point? Statistically, if they ransacked every house in the country, they would find way more incriminating materials for the person that owns the property vs.

Yes, but I believe, as only my wife is a lawyer and not myself, that you can't claim someone else's rights to protect yourself. In this, I mean if the server is not his, then it does not matter if the evidence was illegally obtained, as illegally obtaining it was infringing someone else's rights. It's like if I have a

Yes, but I believe, as only my wife is a lawyer and not myself, that you can't claim someone else's rights to protect yourself. In this, I mean if the server is not his, then it does not matter if the evidence was illegally obtained, as illegally obtaining it was infringing someone else's rights. It's like if I have a

I find the easiest way for me to stick to my diet is to not cut out foods that I like. I did stop drinking all sugary drinks, because you can really get by without those, and they are just so many empty calories. But, food wise, I just try to stick to portion control. I cut down beer to one day a week. Allow a "cheat"

But you make more money at your job than she does because your job is in more demand. You probably work for a company that a) actually makes money and b) where you make them money as well. I'll use the Subway argument there too. If you are the best sandwich maker at subway, your salary is still going to be low because

And that's my new favorite GIF

Eh, my guess based on that is that you are socially liberal, but fiscally conservative and prioritize your fiscal conservativeness over the social stuff. More libertarian, I would imagine. That's not really all that weird, just most people like that prioritize the social stuff. But if you are socially liberal, Fox

Two things: nothing like our police force complaing about its citizens exercising their first amendment rights. Second how bad can the pr in St. Louis be that they put out this statement? This has continuously been the worst PR I keep seeing from the government and its entities on how it's handled. This definitely

I bet it will be more than $20/month. It may cost the cable company $7/month, but they are charging $18/month. To keep cable companies happy, they'll jack that price above that point.

Now, you gave that person an amount. And this isn't met as a put down, but why this specific person do you give money too? This is a more philosophical question.