Hey, wait a minute - shouldn't that one be sitting on rims without tires?

Ahhh...I concede the argument, but I truly don't remember that. Since the car was being pushed by the train, I probably didn't focus on it that much.

I don't remember one of them having a wooden box on the hood. What is that, a fog machine?

I'm pretty sure Walter's cuts on his palms were fingernail punctures rather than slashes. That was a cool scene because it was total misdirection after Olivia can't get the lights to turn on in her room, you're expecting another electrical attack, but it's just Walter going nuts next door.

Uncle Wiggly is creepy enough without changing it. Skeezix gave me nightmares as a child.

"Your arguments suggests that thousands of professionals from all over the globe have decided to forget all their years of training and dedication to their disciplines, and accept "flimsy evidence" with "a margin of error in the vicinity of 100%"."

The raw data is so poorly collected that it is useless (including mercury thermometers suspended over burning oil barrels in Russia and over hot sidewalks in the USA, checked on an occasional basis by unidentified civilians and recorded on paper) and the so-called "scientists" have decided to use computer models to…

Hey, look! It's another Jesus Diaz "Why the iPhone is better than Jesus" article! These never get old!

You make a solution of hot pepper extract and see how many squirts of it cancel out the sweetness of the sweetener.

No, Sucralose is Splenda, not Sweet n' Low.

If you'll stop consuming sugar, they'll taste great.

You may be phenylketoneuric, then.

Still wrong. Blue is Aspartame (Nutra-Sweet), Pink is saccharin (Sweet n' Low), Yellow is Sucralose (Splenda)

If you want it all the time, that's not a craving. It's more like addiction. :)

It's really just Sad Clark eating a sandwich. New internet meme.

Sometimes I read an article on Lifehacker that makes me want to bang my head on the desk. Take a problem that really any non-mentally challenged person doesn't have, which really isn't all that big of a deal in the first place, then write an article that is only 50% effective at actually solving the problem.…

Here's a good guideline: If there's a media PR campaign telling you that something's bad for you, it's probably a myth.

Just sayin' - those who bring up unsolicited gay slurs in unrelated topics usually have deep-seated issues. I'd recommend getting some therapy to come to terms with it.

Does that include turning pages without switching grips? Because the buttons aren't in the right place for that. Also, I think you might be gay, since you brought it up.

I guess I'm the only one that thinks that a science journal printing articles that maligns those who are skeptical of a theory is a bit contrary to the scientific method, huh?