“Of course we can’t judge. If you choose to do it (unlike your lover’s stitch!), and it makes you happy, go for it.”

I guess all I’m trying to say is that if the Confederacy didn’t want to be called a bunch of losers they shouldn’t have lost

Note found in box:

I love the many, many layers of stupidity in that tweet, ranging from the obvious “that’s not even the fucking title, you dipshit” part that Erin pointed out to “no one either in real life or in The Crucible was burned at the stake in Salem” to “the people being accused of witchcraft are not exactly presented as…

I think they`re missing a lot of english literature...

You’re telling me the continents have moved that much in 6,000 years?

I starred your comment because you obviously are thinking about the argument, although I don’t think your analogies hold up.

Has there ever, in the history of America, been an example of this shit? A group supporting the sitting President running attack ads against political opponents OUTSIDE of the election season? Especially keeping in mind Comey isn’t even running for anything?

To put this in context.

No, this isn’t fucking petty! This is the President of the United States of America blocking individual critics that he doesn’t like from viewing and criticizing the information that he himself has described as the best and most efficient way to get his message out there! This is the fucking Bill of Rights that he is…

For once, that comic isn’t relevant.

He’s the president. In my opinion it is government regulation of speech. I am a lawyer, if that matters.

His twitter account is a government account. Your comic applies to private companies. So you jumped the gun in your frantic desire to dig up that comic, because it does not at all apply here.

Sean Spicer said today that Trump’s tweets were official Presidential statements. If you’re willing to go on record that this is a format for official governmental statements then I think that hurts the case for blocking.

He’s the government telling a private party block someone’s access. It’s different.

You don’t have to use that to defend him, nor is it a defense for him. The courts will decide the legality of this, not some unrelated xkcd comic.

He’s the government. I just threw up in my mouth typing that. But, he is deciding who can read the message, and who can respond. It’s a first amendment issue.

He probably believes it sincerely because he doesn’t think of himself as a potential rape victim. He does, however, see himself as someone who could be falsely accused of rape.

I think it is the small group of people who actually know he’s been diagnosed with dementia.

If I’m the ACLU I’m sending him a fruit basket.