So you shifted ground and noted it was fucked up that he did not call “authorities” - a move from 911 - and contact her family. True enough.

You mean you don’t understand how to respect human beings? That’s not moralizing. That’s just normal. You do you too. I hope no one dies in your presence. You’ll make sure to grab some lunch first.

and then he should’ve called authorities. In what world is it okay to then trek on home, still not call authorities, write a note with the location of her body and then kill yourself? How little respect does he have for her and her family that THAT is how they found out?

good call. If I’m ever in a single car accident with my boyfriend and he dies on impact, I’ll just trek on home first, chill out, write a note and then off myself.

Are we heavily implying murder-suicide? Because it sure sounds like a murder-suicide.

didn’t call 911? Tha fuck?

But it actually did follow what happened on AoS. Random people around the world were exposed to Terrigan, were briefly covered in a cocoon, and then emerged with powers. It’s a pretty clear link to that show.

Hey Johnseavey which of your family members worked at Gawker. Because your’re really upset that a tacky internet rag got put in it’s place for it’s ethical sloppiness, and smug sense of security in freedom of the press. Gawker wasn’t the New York Times it was a gossip blog. In fact the most telling thing about…

Had we not all had access to reporting on the court case I could maybe go with you on this, but the Gawker reps (I forget who was there) acted like complete and utter fuckwits on the stand. They were inconsistent about Gawker’s mission statement, they mugged to the courtroom, they smirked when asked serious…

I’m going to pull this out of the grays, and while we disagree here try and keep it civil, I imagine we probably see eye to eye on most things.

“but there’s also no question that the motivation of the suit was to silence the website rather than to seek redress of grievances”

Even in their farewell article, Gawker basically admitted that their business model hinged on being able to grossly violate the privacy of minor celebrities for a profit. And by upsetting that math, Peter Thiel became history’s greatest monster.

The two things that did in Gawker were 1) outing a private citizen, and…

Gawker Media was acquired by Univision who chose to shut down the Gawker blog. Gawker Media was put in a position where they had to sell because they couldn’t defend against the lawsuits, but that doesn’t make the suits themselves frivolous. While I like wrestling, I recognize Hogan has always been a bum and he’s a…

They got shut down because the violated the privacy of an individual by posting a sex tape recorded without that person’s consent. You know, like what the hacker behind the “fappening” is in jail for now. And when they were told to take it down, they refused. That’s what got them destroyed in court. Calling Hulk Hogan…

I’ve never been a Gawker defender, it wasn’t a blog I cared about. I do like this family of blogs though. You seem to know more about this than I do, so please correct me if I’m wrong. The billionaire in question disliked Gawker because a Gawker employee on a Gawker platform outed his sexuality. We agree that’s wrong…

When Jimmy Kimmel is telling you “I just want you to think about your life” and most damning rebuttal you have is a nervous fake-laugh, you need to reevaluate your fucking life. 

Wow, I’ve never seen the actual interview. Literally took direct lines for the Newsroom bit down below, just in case you’ve never seen it before.

Oh god. That video....her eyes and reaction when they’re talking about the stalking app. Like...they’re making a good point that “it’s only a matter of time” before some psycho uses it to find and attack/kill some celebrity. Her response of “Well....we’ve been doing it for four years and it hasn’t happened yet” while…

This is the 4th-5th article on this matter in the past 2 months from this family of sites (Katie’s 3rd on the subject, and with Kirkman’s clarification being available since the very first posting). Benefit of the doubt time has passed.

Referencing a Gawker blind item is like reprinting something scribbled on a bathroom stall and saying, “See? People are talking about this.” It is very irresponsible to hold a man’s reputation hostage until he denies (to your liking) unsourced rumors that don’t even mention him by name.