Glad I wasn't the only one.

Because it was pointy, yes.

My dad did something very similar to Alicia Silverstone.

It's pretty disingenuous to act like this is another case of fetus hysteria. The law comes into play when a baby has been harmed.

First, it's not like anyone should believe anything they read in the Oregonian. It is pretty much a tabloid at this point. Second, the baby was born in an apartment, which is exactly the sort of situation this law encourages.

The best way to treat this is the same way we treat any addiction: therapy. And we know that people don't go to therapy if they're afraid of punishment, which this policy is, and is therefore more likely to increase the number of addicted newborns than decrease it.

There is a huge difference between arresting pregnant women for using, and arresting mothers who knowingly expose their born, live children to harmful substances. Those are vastly different. As stated in the article, both parents were arrested. They're charged with manslaughter. They're not walking away scot free from…

I am excited about this. I have rolled my eyes about Kristen Stewart many a time, but a reviewer whose opinion I respect said that she is great in this and should have been recognized at Cannes. Juliette Binoche is always tremendous. And it's written and directed by Olivier Assayas. This is going to be worth watching.

This movie is guaranteed to pass the Bechdel test. Maybe there won't be a male character in the movie at all. That would make this movie pass an even stricter test, an extremely rare one. :)

Kristen Stewart does more (decent) acting in this trailer than she did in all 5 Twilight movies combined. Finally. Keep it up Kristen!

Oh, yeeeeaah. I love me some ill-fated romances, especially when it involves two women, which I rarely ever see.

I am actually excited about this! KStew looks like she's actually acting, and who doesn't love Juliette Binoche?

I recall that a few years ago, someone determined that it is actually a relatively small percentage of priests doing the abusing, but it's up to 30-35% of the bishops/cardinals doing the moving/hiding/ignoring. The real issue is the enablers and excusers.

Wow, you took that "plausible" comment so far out of context you must have needed a passport. Pak was not talking about Jada's recounting of actual events, she was supporting Jada in having believed her friend's made up story. She's telling Jada "Don't feel bad for believing her, because that's a completely believable…

And don't forget her leather pants!

This is a brave girl rape victims are usually shamed into silence I admire her standing up and showing the world that she did nothing wrong and is not the one to ashamed (know many adults who couldn't face this)

I do think they were awkward, but "That's a very plausible story. That can happen at parties" referred to the fact that, at first, her friend lied and said that her clothes were messed up because she (the friend) put her clothes back on while she was blackout drunk because she threw up on herself—not that her getting…

"After Jada finished telling her story, SuChin Pak said, 'That's a very plausible story. That can happen at parties.' Okay? Thanks for telling us you believe her."

What? To anyone with reading comprehension skills, he's saying that some of the 2% of people who are pedophiles are priests, etc, not that 2% of priests are pedophiles.

Are people angry because he lowballed it or are they angry because it's accurate?