Guns are not dangerous. People are dangerous.

Yes, I remember those guys. The ones who wanted to exterminate all Jews.

I’ll keep my freedoms and my M-class diesel, thanks. (And eventually replace it with a GLC, probably.)

Go read 10 USC 311. You are simply incorrect.

What’s the point? It’s all cosmetic aside from the uprated engine, and while that’s certainly a good thing in this small package, it’s not enough to rate the asking price. CP.

The Bill of Rights uses the term “the right of the people” in both the First and Second Amendments. A fundamental principle of law is that the same words have the same meaning throughout a document. Any restrictions you apply to the Second must be applied equally to the First. So yes, your example is correct as a…

Typical gun grabber leftist: taking away the rights of those who merely disagree with you.

It’s not a license to vote. It’s proof that you’re who you say you are when you go to vote. Big difference.

Depends on where the florist is. If I’m going to a florist in the hood, for some reason, a place I usually avoid, then yes, I’ll carry.

The question was about licensing firearms like cars, and car licenses *are* recognized across all 50 states.

I expect the rate to be rather low, actually, given the number of gun owners compared to the number of crimes committed by those who own guns legally. Your common street thug isn’t going to buy liability insurance, just as he isn’t going to follow laws about passing background checks.

If you truly think that, then you haven’t been watching CNN, let alone MSNBC. Both are doing everything thy can to tear down the President and push the false narratives that people were using to overturn the last election.

Sure. The problem is when you, like the thugs of Antifa, start defining “Nazi” as “anyone who disagrees with the current leftist orthodoxy”.

An ID is not a license.

I’ve already come to the conclusion that I need to be armed if I’m going somewhere Antifa is likely to infest.

Well, when it’s easier for a gay man who owns guns to come out as gay than as a gun owner, that should tell you something...

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States#Accidental_and_negligent_injuries">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States#Accidental_and_negligent_injuries</a>

It was not unheard of for private citizens in the days of the drafting of the Constitution to have cannon and warships. I have no problem with someone owning that stuff if they can afford it. Do you know how expensive it is to run a howitzer?

You seem to have an innate hostility to due process when it would act to let someone possess firearms. Do you treat other Constitutional rights the same way?

Just one more reason I refuse to ever live in that shithole (literally!) town.