Not necessarily. If it was typical parking garage height any car that fits in a typical parking garage would be fine. I would HOPE people would stop otherwise...
Not necessarily. If it was typical parking garage height any car that fits in a typical parking garage would be fine. I would HOPE people would stop otherwise...
I know, I know, another “why don’t they just...” comment but hear me out:
I seem to have random things stop working with IFTTT a lot, including location based. I have it set to turn on a porch light at sunset and that has been the most finicky applet. It’ll work great for a few weeks then randomly just not work until I set it up again.
What does you outdriving a faster car have to do with slow cars being more fun?
“Have you always wanted to own one of the Grand Theft Auto cars that look mostly like the car they’re trying to be but just different enough to avoid getting sued? Then I have the car for you!”
I disagree that the name doesn’t play a part. “Autopilot” to the average person means “fully autonomous”, so they will likely interact with the system as if it is fully autonomous. They will take their hands off the wheel and pick up a book and start reading. If it was labeled as an assistant instead, for example,…
The problem with that notion is the layperson wants to assume that Tesla’s autopilot will totally handle all the driving, including slowing down for other traffic and following changes in the road, which it does for the most part. Autopilot for airplanes and boats like you mention is a different thing altogether…
People want to perceive a savings, not just get a good deal. It’s a marketing tool.
This is why manufacturers need to not be so vocal about release dates. If Tesla said “deliveries in the fourth quarter” rather than “by the end of October” they could have worked the issues and still hit their target. Instead they loudly set a target they likely knew would be risky to hit, and are going to look so-so…
What’s there to be afraid of? The plane is fine. The camera angle also makes it look worse than it is, thought that still would have been a little rough.
Exactly, because Uber has bent the system to allow themselves to not pay their employees minimum wage.
I guess transporting people doesn’t count as responsibility
It’s more the law and less supply and demand.
So driving uber can be a valid career.
But we’re not giving them a fair income. Fuck it then, why do we pay anyone anything? High School Dropout Hank over at Walmart is subhuman then, guess we should pay him $1.25 to stock my groceries while the company pockets all the profit.
It depends how you define exploit. I would say that Uber’s style of exploitation, if we want to call it that, is quite different from many other companies that pay a reasonable wage.
So because Uber doesn’t pay its drivers fairly it’s not a real job? But it’s a real company...
Taxi Driver = Real Job
It’s a bigger picture issue, but I don’t like the “if you don’t like it do something else” argument because there are many, many reasons why that can be difficult. Some are personal, others are institutional. Regardless, why is it okay that we as customers take advantage of these employees because the ‘chose’ the…
Building a business that relies on ‘hobbyists’ to generate a profit is a really crappy way to build a business.