japhilips
JAPhilips
japhilips

Suuure, just like cigarette smokers “invited” cancer.

It should be the opposite. You get an abortion unless you can give a good reason why you want to raise a child.

Actually, “pro-life” is one side of the argument, and “pro-choice” is the middle ground. There’s actually 4 sides. 1. Against abortion, for making it illegal. 2. Against abortion, but still pro-choice (won’t impose their views on others). 3. Okay with abortion and pro-choice. 4. Pro-abortion and willing to force

If you are in an accident and your brain waves stop, you are declared dead, even though machines at the hospital keep your heart beating. The pregnant woman’s body keeps the fetus’s heart beating, and it does not have brain waves (before around 24 weeks), so it is not a living person.

I love being a mom, but I get sick of parents gushing about how wonderful it is to have kids and then whining about how they need special treatment because it is sooo hard.

Since births already outnumber deaths by a wide margin and we are adding about 9,000 people to the planet every hour net gain, we need desperately to convince more people to have fewer children if we are all to survive. Giving birth is a totally selfish act, and I will not support that choice.

What if I took time off to climb Mt. Everest? That’s also physically demanding and not relaxing, so why shouldn’t I get paid time off for that??

No, having children does not benefit society as a whole. Adding to the population benefits the very wealthy and the warmongers, but what benefits society is for all of the children we have to be well cared for. So the trick is to give lots of benefits to parents so their children will get good care, without