Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • theroot
    janewinslow
    xgf
    janewinslow

    ...after having been having multiple times over the previous 5 years.

    Nobody here is saying the teenager’s motives are relevant to Weiner’s guilt. He’s guilty as sin. Weiner’s lawyers want the jury or judge to think the girl’s motives somehow excuse Weiner, but hopefully that tired old excuse won’t work.

    I think there’s a lot of evidence all that is true and that the girl or her family were politically motivated. It’s irrelevant as hell, though. Weiner committed a crime all by himself.

    Yeah, her motivations don’t affect his guilt, but for sure she planned this. I’m sure she had no idea what kind of a snowball might result and how big its impact would be, but she’s always been straightforward about it being for a book.

    That, and also sexting a teenager after she tells him she’s in high school.

    Men leak naked photos of women: “She’s the one who took the photo. He just posted it to the internet.”

    Men leak naked photos of women: “She’s the one who took the photo. He just posted it to the internet.”

    Men leak naked photos of women: “She’s the one who took the photo. He just posted it to the internet.”

    I hope for her sake he was.

    If it were a teen girl who was sexting (and not her father) I would shed tears for her whether or not she sought the sexting out — and for whatever reason she did it.

    Say what you will but I just re-read all the past articles about “Weinergate: Presidential Election Edition,” complete with quotes from the teen, and I gotta agree with Weiner’s lawyer.

    I hope his son changes his last name. Just sayin’.

    Oh. You’re a contractor. You’re one of the “not quite good enough to keep around” guys. I’m a director who has to deal with the real employees.

    OMG That’s so true!

    Fair enough.

    I didn’t include estimates of how many rapes go unreported. According to RAINN, of 1,000 rapes only 331 are reported.

    I’m thinking you’ve never seen an actual douche bag.

    ...they’d recognize a paucity of unarmed white people killed by black police officers.

    Why the fuck would this comment be written off as mansplaining? Your comment sucks for a lot of reasons, but it’s not mansplaining in the slightest. Jesus Fucking Christ with you people.

    Sorry, my keyboard has been getting jiggy with it today. I meant to write: