The thing about fake writers isn’t necessarily that they’re fake. It’s that they use stereotypes to create caricatures that readers can then point to as evidence that those stereotypes are real.

Her essay boasts anti-logic! Let’s review:
1. Guy might not be over his ex.
2. Guy travels a lot so scheduling time together is difficult.
3. Still giving it a chance, though.
4. Guy dies.
Conclusion: Should’ve still given it a chance, though.

Of people like you who don’t bother to consider and engage? Jezebel isn’t the entity who said that being falsely accused of rape is worse than being raped. And the commenter you responded to was just offering a sarcastic interpretation of that statement. If you have a different interpretation, offer it. Otherwise…

That’s interesting. I’ve been thinking about that word “victim” too. It’s so belittled that no one wants to admit that they were victimized. But it’s actually a really descriptive word. Some things are out of your control, and a criminal deciding to attack you is definitely one of those things.

Super articulate contribution there. Also quite novel: you disagree because jezebel. Never heard that one before.

Grass doesn’t stain clothing? If you mow microclover it won’t produce flowers that attract bees. You don’t need to mow it as often as you mow grass.

If you mow microclover you won’t have the flowers that attract bees.

For that matter, grass stains clothing. And if you mow microclover (not as often as grass) you won’t have flowers to attract bees.

These smug comments from parents are hilarious. Children play outside? What a strange concept! Plant some damn microclover, you idiots, so you can spend more time with your precious snowflakes and less time mowing. Microclover is cheap and good for the soil. If you don’t like it, next year you can plant scotch moss,…

The internet? Facebook, Twitter, and even Google are not the internet. And since when can hate groups meet at the library? Maybe they can but I certainly haven’t seen them there.

This wouldn’t bother me if the company weren’t claiming to take things like threats, racist diatribes, and fake news seriously.

Exactly. Their interpretation of terrorism has fuck all to do with the real terrorists threats (in the US at least): white supremacists and anti-abortionists. They’re happy as long we don’t post pics of ourselves breast feeding.

Let me get this straight: You asked him to remind you of his name and he said, “I thought you were dead”? I mean, he’s a creeper based on literally any one of the other things you said, but that statement is a lot more than “tone of voice.” That sounds like he has some serious mental problems. Plus maybe guns since…

Clover! Clover is great for kids.

Clover works great. I just planted it and it’s perfect for 3 year olds.

I see your Millennial Pink and I raise you California Salmon. Every. Other. Fucking. Building.

I can’t find any petitions but at least tell Trump what you think:

By writing it that way you imply that the girls were callous toward the people who helped them. If you read the article a commenter above linked to, you’ll find that adults on the train were already giving first aid to the injured and that 911 had been called. Many others rushed from the train screaming in terror as…

It’s a moral obligation to not criticize innocent victims who are in the midst of a shocking, terrifying life-and-death situation.

Because, you know, what’s important here is to find fault with the victims instead of focusing on the dangerous rise of white supremacism in our country.