@ModernBawhair: London bridge was the name given to many different bridges over the years; None of them was this one. This is Tower Bridge - the current London Bridge is far less interesting.

@kitsuneconundrum: When they add oil instead of shells.

@DeadnBuried: Or don't bother - I finished the game and really wish I'd just given up when I got to chapter 3.

@TehLastTimeLord: It's been up there before, that's how I got to see it a few months back. I guess they've removed it for some reason.

@Ben Babcock: Not only is it a known form of temporal Paradox, but it's also one that's been used in many other well respected time travel stories. In fact it's used in the vast majority to some degree:

@Reavyn: Children are more than capable of walking past a sign long before they are capable of reading a Potter novel, or before any reasonable parent would allow them to watch one of the films or read the books too them. Plus it's not the image that's scary in and of itself (although that might be enough) but that…

@hdgotham (Hannah Wilson): Nope, the movie and the book were written at the same time (the film as a partnership, the novel by just Clarke), with ideas from one being transplanted into the other.

@Aklost: I take it you've not seen many people paint or draw in the flesh as it were? There may be a handful of geniuses out there who could scratch that up in 10 minutes, but for the majority of artists somewhere between 1 and 5 hours (And we're assuming they could do it to that level of quality, I know I couldn't).…

@Carey.Laius: Certainly, on the train at least.

@Salari: Hey, I wasn't being overly serious, I thought you didn't know what the reference was so I was filling you in. Looks like it's not me who's being overly serious.

@Salari: Clearly you don't understand the reference. It's the way Dr. Who gets out of ever having to explain how their time travel really works (Sort of useful after 40-odd years of contradictions). It's all wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey and therefore, as the Doctor puts it "complicated".

@Tpadz: I would stop posting immediately! Oh, no, wait a minute...

@themediatrix: I work with a guy who uses "End of Line" whether you're likely to get the reference or not. That'd be my favourite.

@FriedPeeps: Having tried to get a decent picture of my Son yesterday while he was running around the park this sounds great. Consumer grade cameras tend to have a slight lag between hitting the button and taking the picture. several times I'd have the shot lined up, click, and he's move before it registered. …

@AmishKamikaze: I disliked AW with a passion, but I'm totally with you on JC2.

Rico Dredd anyone?

@izikavazo: You don't have to watch Cars 2, no-one is twisting your arm and walking you into the theatre but I do; I'll be frog marched in there by my (currently) 3yr old son. that he would want ot see it so badly is why they're making a second one (and so they can sell him, via me, all the new cars toys they'll get…

@Busya: Thanks Busya. You're right, the trailer is pretty underwhelming, but I'll wait to see some in game action before I make a call on the quality. I should go hunt some down, bound to be some somewhere by now if they showed at E3.

@PhDelish hearts KG: No, as Tom Baker's Doctor never interacted with any of the others (In "The 5 Doctors" he was caught in a time loop or something - been years since I saw it, but I think that was it).

@The_Geb: Well, it's a university that teaches you how to not use magic, because magic is so amazingly dangerous. It is therefore a far more practical academy than Hogwarts in my mind. And yes, HEX is all kinds of wonderful.