First, I voted for Clinton. I was 3-for-3 in voting for Bill and Hillary. I did not like Hillary as a candidate, but I could not with a clear conscience vote for that man. I loathed that narcissistic attention whore LONG BEFORE he ran for president.
First, I voted for Clinton. I was 3-for-3 in voting for Bill and Hillary. I did not like Hillary as a candidate, but I could not with a clear conscience vote for that man. I loathed that narcissistic attention whore LONG BEFORE he ran for president.
Berman was so pissed about it, he blamed it on the Electrical College.
Let me repeat for you since the original comment purposely omitted it: THEY BEAT FUCKING #9 AUBURN BY 13 POINTS ON THE ROAD.
Omitting Texas A&M’s 13-point road win vs. the #9 team in the rankings proves that you are deliberately deceptive.
Why is this trade so difficult to understand? This makes perfect sense. If you want to be paid and don’t care about “the Partiot way,” we’re trading you to the worst team in the NFL. Enjoy your money. Congratulations on being irrelevant for the rest of your career.
OR the social media bullies believe that only people on the left have the right to criticize the government.
Wait—is it cool and acceptable to say that Colin Kaepernick sucks again?
Oh spare me the “we’re here to create the narrative” bullshit. You were there TO COVER A FOOTBALL GAME. There is no narrative unless you choose to create it. They bitch about anyone who says that he’s not a distraction and he’s not pissing off his locker room. And then they go out and CREATE THE DISTRACTION. They did…
The defense gave up 38 last year and they still won. Maybe Cam was better last year.
WAIT! So the narrative is “The Panthers defense doesn’t help poor Cam Newton” and not “The Panthers win if Cam Newton doesn’t throw a red zone INT in the end zone in the 2nd quarter?”
She said that she “should not have said that.” Because the social media bullies don’t tolerate anyone who disagrees.
Shame on Nantz.
But DON’T YOU DARE call them attention whores.
Oh joy. The top story of the day is “Trump is tweeting stupid shit again” FOR THE 3235092343rd DAY IN A ROW.
We don’t need to hear from both sides if one side is batshit crazy and their stance is indefensible. This is how Republicans are winning and manipulating the system. This is done for the sake of “good television,” and Trump supports get to go on the air and shout out talking points and memes to reinforce the “I hate…
Fine, then explain how it’s bigotry. Libeals denounce conservatives when they resort to name calling with no explanation. I don’t even categorize myself as either. They did the same thing with Michael Sam. People sat there and bullied the other side with their “if you think he is a ‘distraction’ then YOU ARE A BIGOT”…
I believe that Trump has blown this “liberal media” theory out the water. From day one, they let Trump control the conversation and the headlines. I can’t stand this modern media view that “trending” and “newsworthy” are synonymous, and the most outrageous tweet of the day wins the news cycle. They did what ESPN did…
I hear stuff like this and I wonder: really? Has he really “reignited” or advanced the discussion? Is there quantifiable proof? The advancement I’m seeing here is the race to see who can have the most original or creative National Anthem “protest.”