jakey97
Rini6
jakey97

Um, not really. Corporations hold huge amounts of power. They now earn more, in comparison to the workers than they have for many decades , since the gilded age of the 20's and we all know what happened at the end of the 1920's. When the CEO earns over 200 times what the workers do they really can do whatever they

or regular chocolate

I would kill for sky-chocolate, though

What about not killing and raping because you don't like to see people suffer??

Religion helped us in the past but it is time to move on.

I am an atheist and after seeing what some of them did in Uganda I agree that Evangelicals should get a low rating... perhaps a negative number.

True ... the money factor pretty much has tentacles in everything.

I am not saying that there isn't an artistic aspect left. I am just saying that the commercial has infiltrated a lot of it.

To a degree.. true but the mass production and slave labor is not as prevalent in the art world.

It's not art when it is not about self-expression but is about demographics and marketing.

Fashion is big business first. The self expression and art is the good part but it is secondary.

I'm not saying it's all just commercial but that much of what could be art and expression has become a commercial endeavor.

I so. Both are very much commercial and market oriented. The art is lost. Ditto much music and many films which is truly sad.

Yeah. Sports, to me, seem frivolous.

I am mixed on women's magazines. I find the occasional article I am interested in but maybe I'm too old for some of them. Reading Esquire also annoys me sometimes.

I am a physician and also follow scientific news politics and music etc... I also like to see what new looks people are wearing and wear them myself if I like them. This is different from being a pawn of the fashion industry or buying based on designer labels.

Yes... but groan!! :-)

Maybe the real qualification should be knowing the data on chronic traumatic encephalopathy? If you know the data, I don't think you want your kid playing, macho or not.

At this point it's all about what's best for the kid. A single mother is not an incomplete equation and there is no need for a father. However, if the kid knew Patric as a dad, then he will feel the absence. The real question is "Did the kid really have a full relationship with Patric as a dad?" and "Was he abusive?"