Get back to me when they find a CRYSTAL skull.

The Razorpit works surprisingly well, pays for itself very quickly, and makes a great travel holder for your razor.

So it's f.lux for your house. That's pretty cool. Could probably be done with Philips Hue lights and some programming.

Should be able to tell the species just by measuring the hole:

Shutter Island looks pretty ragged these days.

Good think that Red Line got extended to ... the same places that the Blue Lline goes.

They're building a Silicon Savannah? I don't know how much programming is going to get done - but I'll be there for St. Patrick's Day!

Haters are, apparently, still going to hate things.

This should be easy to fix from a (not very "free market") policy standpoint. Offer a tax break on public underground parking and implement a new tax on public surface level parking. You will lose ugly surface lots, but you will quickly gain available underground spots. And if you're digging that big hole to put an…

I'm sure everyone realizes this, but HDMI 1.4 (which this has) only supports 4k/30p. In six months, computers/receivers/monitors will have HDMI 2.0 which supports 4k/60p ... so, you might not want to take the early adopter hit on 4k just yet.

Go ahead and get this (PL15/1.7) and the PL25/1.4. When you win the lottery (or save diligently), get the PL42.5/1.2. That's an amazing prime "holy trinity".

Why don't you get a better damn job so you can afford some new damn toys?

This seems like a bad idea - and is likely not a very good camera or system at this point. But I can see Samsung using the new NX Mini mount on a Galaxy phone in the very near future.

Did you mean spartan family? Because there's no way that this plywood stilt house is going to handle the day-to-day life of a Spartan family.

I bet that crazy, mouse-eating alien is great in the sack.

Yeah, if you're a pro - and your livelihood depends on the photograph meeting certain needs, then by all means go big or go home. And once you have some awesome glass and know how to use it ... it would be VERY hard to give that up to change formats.

Well, it's not an argument, it's math. The Panasonic covers a 70-200mm 35mm equivalent focal length.

I think we agree on this - but you CAN compare these two lenses (although I've not seen it done by one of the camera sites, other than those pics by dpreview).

No, I think you're thinking of what happens when you put a "full-frame" lens on a body with an APS-C sensor.

Most mirrorless lenses suck. Full stop. End of story. The ones that are great also cost a lot of money, so its not like you gained any advantage in going mirrorless.