Good pickup! I hadn't even thought of that!

Why yes, yes it is.

My son is in the 99th percentile for both height and weight, and at 18 months, 37", and 33 pounds, he's both massive and a twig! Tight end is my thought, as his height chart shows him with an 80% chance to be 6'7" or greater.

Except for the fact that the passenger compartment is cockpit tight, there's no rear seat, and the trunk is laughable.

Got a 'D' model tattooed on my left forearm, partially because it's the best prop fighter ever built, and partially because it's an ode to my Mustang (the car) penchant.

Definitely. No badge on the side means V6. Time might have gotten permission to release the V6, but the GT is a different story.

The Camaro didn't go on sale until 1966, and while it was likely designed in 1964-65, it was a response to the Mustang. There is, quite literally, zero chance that's a Camaro, unless the picture was taken several years after the car was designed and built.

From what I was reading yesterday, the car is a half inch shorter, with a 2" wider rear track. While I agree that the press photos make the car look tall, I think it's going to have a much nicer stance than any of us are used with with Mustangs. I wish I could lower my 2006 GT, but I'm still trying to decide if I'm…

Very significantly sized control thrusters, plus reaction wheels. The spacecraft to carry that cannon would be absolutely MASSIVE and would take dozens of missions to build, plus, would require far more fuel than has ever been carried aboard a spacecraft, just to control the attitude of the craft. Firing at the rate…

As someone who drives, and is currently sitting in a Mustang GT, I'd take a turbo'd four with 305 HP over a N/A V6 with similar HP, any day. That said, my next Mustang will have eight cylinders.

It's a little more expensive than $15 for a 750 ml bottle, but Larceny is a new-ish brand from Heaven Hill, maker of Old Fitzgerald, among others. I can get a 750 near me for about $19, and although I haven't had all the bourbons above, I think it's every bit as good as a Buffalo Trace or the small batch Evan…

Right. All that. Enjoy your weekend.

I got you, douchey internet assumption guy! Any time you want to make a blanket statement about why someone's choice is wrong, because it clashes with your opinion, I'll be there to help you out!

Regardless of the name for this vehicle (which I think is absolutely stupid), does anyone actually think this vehicle is attractive in styling? Autoblog was going gaga over it this morning. I think it looks like a turd, and is just as awful as the other Kia mobiles out there.

He didn't say he wanted a Magnum wagon over a CTS wagon, he said he'd prefer a Magnum over a Durango. Reading comprehension can be fun and profitable!

What about 'vagumach'?

What a terrible thing! I hope his insurance company picks up the tab, or someone is able to find some of their belongings. I really hate people, sometimes.

I agree with you 100%, but I really wish you'd sprinkle a smattering of periods around your comments to make them more readable.

Airbus has been using them for years, as have the F-16 and F-22.

While it's purely anecdotal, my old boss had a diesel Excursion, and used it to tow a very large camper. After the 100k mile break-in period (diesels get better mileage after they're broken in...well broken in), he was getting mid-twenties in combined driving. Towing, he was in the high teens. My other coworker,…