Well... this person was right, zombies eventually were ahead (sign is from Austin, Last of Us started there)

The title name annoys the shit out of me.

Fun, but for the love of fuck remove that SUPER HOT SUPER HOT SUPER HOT crap when you complete a level. We get it, you're called fucking Super Hot.

Yep, we love showcasing this kind of stuff and would love to do it more often!

I wish we could get more devs to talk about their process more often. Giving the industry more transparency could help consumers appreciate the work that goes into these seemingly simple tasks. I love to hear more from Level Designers, as I myself am one, but have only been in the industry for 2 years.

How did Titanfall come up in the conversation? This is a parallel developed game. They didn't cook this up last week.

Titanfall isn't original either. I'm sick of that argument every time their is a new game trailer for anything. As far as futuristic FPS' go, I'd say it's different looking enough. It's been done to death, so I say we just let them do it again in their own COD way. For the first time since MW2, I'll bite.

Because it resembles Crysis more than Titanfall?

In episode 2F09 when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a magic xylophone or something?

to be fair there are no characters and no outside world to keep in memory and you have no idea what kind of hardware is being used but if he's some one who does 3d work regulalry it's probably a beast of a system.

The main difference is that ACU is a full game with a lot of stuff in it to process too

Rich, I hate to be the bearer of bad news but there is no way you are hitting that calorie mark in that amount of time on a stationary bike. I'm an avid road cyclist and typically put in 100+ miles a week in during cycling season in the northeast US. A two hour long 30 mile ride just barely crack 1000 calories for me.

The implications are pretty hard to miss—it's not a matter of what I'm imagining, it's a matter of what the video creator was trying to convey. I usually find "unnecessarily censored" videos funny—but the "implied acts" pushed this thing into deeply troubling territory. Fiction does not exist in a vacuum; it is a…

Fictional or not, she's still a representation of an adolescent girl. I teach and work with literature for a living, and there are a lot of works in Western canon that are not exactly "tasteful," Lolita, by Nabokov, being chief amongst them—but they had some artistic merit. This was just some goober implying a…

Phil Fish called, and would like you to join his club of super-enlightened persons with super-important opinions.

This is just disgusting

You know, I read your comment before watching the video, and I rolled my eyes and said to myself, "oh sure, someone's always gotta be offended." But now that I've watched it, you're totally right! Normally, I find "unnecessary censorship" stuff hilarious because they tend to be just random clips taken out of context,…

I couldn't agree more... I've seen a lot of stuff on the internet, and I usually roll my eyes when people get offended by anything, but this actually upset me. Not funny, and extremely offensive.

Customers are stupid. I am involved in design and marketing.

"And if I get all twisted up based on what they're saying, I'm actually going to build a product they don't like."