Did you accidentally go to a local arts and crafts fair and not the RNC?

( 1 You can’t walk into the convention

“I and my editor at SB Nation hoped to find possible answers as to what could have led to him to become a convicted rapist and sexual predator.”

He is bad and his ideas are bad and he should feel badly about it. He should probably look for an alternative career, too.

But don’t you understand, this just RUINED his life- that’s the real tragedy here. /s

“YEAH BUT GUYS FOUR OTHER GUYS WHO ARE HIGHER UP THAN ME READ MY STORY GUYS SO IT’S NOT ALL MY FAULT OK GUYS”

“I AM SORRY I GOT CAUGHT SYMPATHIZING WITH A RAPIST, PLEASE ACCPET MY APOLOGY DEMONSTRATED HERE WITH MORE SYMPATHINZING OF SAID CONVICTED RAPIST."

I hoped to present a more fully-rounded portrait of Mr. Holtzclaw than had appeared in the press. I hoped to explore the question of what had happened to this once-promising young man.

Jeez, didn’t you read the story? He was a former football player who once played football but no longer played football, and was well liked by the people who liked him! And those rapes he committed but maybe he didn’t? You weren’t there so who knows?

Sure, it sounds like SB Nation has put its longform program on hiatus and, for all intents and purposes, actually enacted this plan, but maybe that’s what longform wanted.

I was reading it, thinking “so ok when are they going to say anything at all other than just that everyone who knew Holtzclaw seven years ago thinks he couldn’t have done this.” The last sentence was like the writer thought to himself, “wait oops I can’t sound too much like I’m supporting this guy, throw in a sentence…

Cops “protect their own.”

Is he receiving death threats?

Being honest, I can’t stand the way these endorsements have been written.

The New York times is supposed to be this established paper with great legitimacy, and yet every time they endorse the candidates, it’s like their stenographing talking points and campaign materials.

Honestly, though? Republicans HATE Hillary. With the current state of politics NEITHER would be able to do much. We need turnout more than anything, so I don’t think that voting for Hillary for that particular reason is the answer.

Clinton doesn’t know how to work the system, she personifies the system, as in fitting effortless into it, while giving the perception that she would fight for the average citizen’s wellbeing, when she’s only interested in upholding the status quo. I’d pick the guy with the great ideas who might win over the public…

Bless you for trying to get through to some dungeon-inhabiting trollbeast, but honestly, it’s probably a waste of breath. Some dudes will never fucking get it.

Ignoring the politics between NARAL and Sanders because both democratic candidates are committed to getting rid of the amendment; this is awesome!

Good.

What’s the confusion?