Typical left-wing pinko liberal media bias tactics #101: quote people accurately.

And Zuckerberg likely knows that people do such on Facebook. Same with Reddit’s executives. I disagree that running their service makes them evil as I don’t feel that they have an onus to police their ads.

I would say that they should have no more obligation than reddit or Facebook to actively search through user postings. Also I would assume most traffickers aren’t completely obvious about what they are selling otherwise law enforcement could round them up pretty easily. Which would make it that much harder to automate…

“Do you really think that Hillary Clinton is debate-prepping for three or four days. Hillary Clinton is resting, okay?”

When you aren’t. They are essentially a bulletin board with the exception that they charge for posting. You can do the same thing on reddit (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiE2Ny4_sjPAhWEzxQKHSdkDmUQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fr4r%2F&usg=AFQjC…

If this is how it is, then Craigslist execs need to be arrested and charged with the same thing. Also, every newspaper owner who has ever allowed ads for “escorting”. Also, the companies that sell the Yellow Pages as well for their escorting ads. Now admittedly you don’t see those much anymore, but they used to be…

*scrolls down list looking for zoolander*

Sharia law would be fine if it had more Jesus.

If this is what your religion teaches / preaches, your religion sucks.

Nope, it’s not about white dreads, it’s about discriminating against blacks and it’s now deemed court-sanctioned discrimination.

The immutable characteristic thing is really problematic, because so much of the racial discrimination present today isn’t based *directly* on skin color, but rather on stereotypes associated with racial groups. There is some precedent that recognizes this (too lazy to pull out citations right now), but the fact that…

Yep, they should have a trained liaison that takes you to the police station and supports you from the university, but they shouldn’t be doing the investigations.

Title IX is fucked.

I mean I believe both that a child would kill a child, and that parents can and have done unspeakable things to their kids (even in the service of another kid), but like... in this case, the evidence doesn’t point that way. It points the other way.

I’m happy to keep repeating this: Matching DNA was found in JonBenet’s underwear, under her fingernails and on the waistband of her leggings.

There was a serial rapist in Arizona or Nevada I believe and they struggled to catch him because he was not in any database including CODIS. They caught him with good old fashion detective work. Not being in CODIS does not mean shit, just makes it more difficult for investigators to identify a suspect, especially…

And again: The DNA sample inside the underwear and on the waistband of her longjohns MATCH EACH OTHER. The odds that they both come from the same factory worker are so astronomically high as to be impossible. The family did not do it. An intruder did.

Nope:

I haven’t watched CBS’s, but I watched A&E’s and I’ve read analysis of the case by several profilers over the years and none of the actual evidence points to the family.

I’m totally reading every last post about this divorce, but is anyone else starting to hate themselves for it just a little?