No, you’re right. And you’re using common sense, something the writer who wrote this has shown herself incapable of, time and time again.

a) Criticizing someone for appropriating Harajuku is silly, because Harajuku itself borrows from non-Japanese cultures.

I don’t care how many people someone lives with. I care about how many of the people he lives with claim his medical benefits and social security checks.

Just think about social security for a second. Currently, if you were married for 10 years or more and get divorced, you’re eligible for half your spouses SS benefits. Their benefits don’t decrease. That means theoretically, 1 person’s SS could be paying for multiple people, but there’s a limited number of them based…

I see it more from a practical legal perspective. The complexity of relationships grows exponentially. A few examples off the top of my head:

This one’s the best because of the two casually working in the background.

“Yes, Laura. This month saw an increase in patient intakes by 6% and Susan is currently giving Robert an epic blowjob. Any questions?”

I’m kind of intrigued by the woman who insisted her Jim Morrison shirt stays on.

Choosing chastity because you dig that lifestyle is feminism. Choosing chastity because sex = sin and realizing that you like being chaste is Stockholm Syndrome.

Yeah I mean I feel like this lady thought she’d get more intrigue by a click baity title. There’s nothing inherently feminist about abstinence, in fact I’d say if your motivation is based on a commandment from a patriarchal religion then there’s an argument to be made that it is not feminist at all. I really don’t…

Feel free to disagree with me. Here’s my take. Choosing chastity as a woman isn’t feminism. Choosing chastity as a woman and having the right to not be judged as less or more of a human being because of it is feminism.

welcome to Kinja... where a good chunk of the people have zero idea how to have a discussion or disagreement and remain respectful.

Sorry but I can’t get on board with you basically saying that who cares if women get fucked over and can’t use Airbnb to rent their houses out anymore because other assholes on Airbnb are racist assholes. Plus, the law isn’t on your side becuase for homeowners renting out a space with less than four units, Airbnb…

But...no. The Fair Housing Act exempts and does not apply to:

This is a weird one for me. On one hand, of course, hate discrimination. On the other hand, it’s people renting out their personal homes. If I don’t want to rent to you based on whatever, even if it’s a shitty awful reason, then I’m not going to.

Yeah, but those ladies still pay the uterus tax, which means their athleticism is simply not the best. No offense and I totally support ladies’ sports, but it’s not competitive with guys.

Yes, it’d be much better if she’d lied to him and conducted an affair. People are not wedded for life. You’re allowed to leave a relationship for any reason.

Not any more than she did. She’s entitled to protest if she’d like, but nobody’s obligated to give her a platform on which to do it.

Playing the anthem early pretty much proves the uselessness of playing it at all, right?

“We don’t want Megan Rapinoe to cause a scene, so we’re going to cause a scene.”