None of that is a lab report. It’s once again, JUST THE SAME GUY.
HE says people said something. Find. Another. Source.
Ivybug!
ivybug2
This isn’t a run of mill book
None of that is an additional source. For like the millionth time, You got one guy vs every other source I’ve found.
More from THE SAME DUDE, is not another source. And it doesn’t even say what you are claiming.
Seriously, get off Reddit and just accept reality.
Once again, James Kolar was an investigator for the Boulder DA office on this case.
Like I said, try getting of Reddit. I don’t know why CNN and so many other news sources would say it’s a match if it’s not. But I know why a guy selling a book might say something that helps sell a book.
And you are STILL ignoring that it was found in THREE places. Discounting ONE (and failing) doesn’t discount the…
Seriously, again with the Reddit AMA’s?
Right, I’m sure the multitude of sourced that say the fingernail DNA was a match with the panty and long john DNA are all just making it up. As opposed to a guy selling a book.
Again it’s a fact that the same DNA was in three places. Even if it’s not under the nails, It’s still…
Again, find me something I can actually look at that says what you are saying. If the only thing is some book by some random guy, it’s because your info is outdated or just plain made up.
It is a fact that the same male DNA was found in three different places on her body. So again I ask you to explain how that…
“ Is it a match with the DNA in her underwear? possibly, but it is not with all certainty.”
Are you serious with this? A Reddit AMA? ANd you expect me to take you seriously?
There were fingernail marks on the neck,. I saw the pictures with my own eyeballs. If you want to show something else, find an actual medical report or something.
The Boulder Police fucked this up hardcore and can’t let go of the parent…
As for the DNA, for what it’s worth, they tested underwear straight out of the package and there was DNA on it.
It does matter that there is no match in the CODIS database.
The images they showed indicated that the holes didn’t match up with a taser but did match the connector parts of track that was at the crime scene.
The dna evidence in the underwear was minuscule
They didn’t have any cooperation from the police. The police have always been convinced they are guilty and continued to pursue them despite the DA’s office telling them the evidence did not support the idea of the parents involvement.
So nothing that shows the fingernail DNA was unidentified (indeed your quoted source said DNA was found under the nails. No mention of the different DNA samples not being a match. And your “proof” regarding the tape is a website (not any actual police or coroners report or any links from that article to such sources)…
The material under JonBenet’s fingernails was never identified.
The underwear was straight out of the package,
The DNA evidence on the underwear is not in the CODIS database,