Yes! I saw the one on A&E, very good. I have to say I found their presentation very convincing.

The fingernail marks on her neck that showed she was alive and struggling when she was strangled are what cinch it for me when it comes to thinking it was an intruder and not the family. I can maybe see them trying to make…

Which is to say white people are afforded the range of motion to adopt black hairstyles such as dreads and rows without the punishment that black women get for wearing natural or protective hairstyles in society, but most especially in the workplace.

Look, I’m not saying it absolutely should not be allowed. I’m completely in favor of the lawsuit in the story.

I understand that dissolution could be complicated if children want to identify with the race or religion of the non-custodial parent.

I was pointing out that if you are a landlord in the US, there are federal regulations.

Sorry it didn’t stroke your ego as much as you thought it would.

When did I ever say I wanted it to be ok? I’m pointing out what the law actually is because a lot of people clearly don’t understand and think these people discriminating on ABNB are breaking the law. No matter what I personally feel about it, they are not breaking the law.

No, it doesn’t. Federal law allows for discrimination when you are renting a room in a home where you live.

Those are the facts.

According to federal law, you can flat out say you are discriminating against people for otherwise protected reasons. Some states, like CA, let you base your decision on whatever but can’t say it. But in most you can say it, you just can’t advertise it.

You can run an ad stating women or men only. Other than that, the advertisements are the only thing regulated. Your decisions can be based on whatever you want.

ETA: A lot of people also advertise for certain ages, though that seems to be technically illegal, it’s a common practice no one does anything about.

Legally, when renting out a room in a place you live, you actually do have more leeway to discriminate than you would if you were renting out an apartment to someone. The rules are not the same.

All she did was make herself look worse too.

That’s just fucked up.

It’s crazy. I saw the school lists online and apparently you are supposed to supply the school with general stuff, like garbage bags. WTF?

HER wrath. Know your deities!

Oh right, because legal decisions have never been wrong—Plessy v. Ferguson ring a bell?

I’m fine with their implemented effect if it means not killing people in my space, and for whom I am responsible.

it stands to reason we have an equally, arguably more reasonable expectation to safety.

If it’s all about the legal decision, then they are not at fault, and how am I an asshole? Your position at least made a little bit of sense when you were saying the theater was at fault DESPITE the ruling.

But you go ahead and run off now that your arguments have completely fallen apart.

“It misses the point that the purpose of personal injury suits like these is to try and make someone who after they have been hurt by someone else,”