ivannazarov
Ivan Nazarov
ivannazarov

“Sir, do you know how many parsecs you were doing when I pulled you over?”

I don’t know that I would do much to counter this if I was Ossoff. I have a feeling this may backfire, as the guy comes across as thoroughly likable to me. Hell, maybe he should exploit it. Perhaps a big enough chunk of the people who voted for Trump precisely because he didn’t come across as serious will vote for

Is your cat named Sark by any chance? As he looks at you with narrowed eyes, he is thinking: “You’ll regret this.”

Okay, gotcha.

Honestly, they don’t give anything away here. You can watch this safely. And it is hilarious.

Well, if it’s good enough for Stephen King, then . . .

That’s true too. Like I said, he comes through when it counts.

I love that he goes out on a high note in Alien. He’s kind of a dick through most of the movie, and then he comes through when it counts. Such a great character.

Plus it has another late great actor in it, Philip Seymour Hoffman, in one of his most upbeat roles, so it’s a two-fer in that respect.

Yeah, Jamesy buried the lead there. I don’t really care about the size of Drax’s gun. I want to know what the hell it says on that awesome shirt Star-Lord is wearing!

Oh man, Calexico better be the official soundtrack for this.

Well, that’s a bit unfair, isn’t it? I mean, there aren’t many actors who can hold their own against Olivier. But for what he does, I think the Rock is a pretty solid actor. At least he isn’t a meathead like a lot of buff action stars we could name here.

Exactly.

This is how actors who portray villains should look at their role. Nobody ever sees himself as a villain in real life, and a so an actor taking on a villain role should try to view his character through that lens for the sake of verisimilitude. Anyway, aside from characters that are just flat out insane—like the

Actually, he’s right though. Pedophilia is technically a primary or exclusive attraction to prepubescent children, not to adolescents. A primary or exclusive attraction to adolescents would be hebephilia or ephebephilia. These terms are well-defined and understood in the psychological community. Just because the media

Well, as horrible as Milo is, he’s right about pedophilia. It is, strictly speaking, a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. (One need not even act on it for it to be pedophilia—the attraction alone fits the definition.) What he’s describing would more accurately be termed hebephilia /

Heh.“I think I like Uranus better.”

Exactly what came to my mind when I read the article. One of my all-time favorite sci-fi novels. It’s getting around the time I need to reread it. This was a good reminder.

Robinson Crusoe on Mars: “This film is scientifically authentic. You can tell by the fact that we put this endorsement inside an official-looking seal. Science!”

I don’t think I’ve seen that, but it sounds intriguing. Thanks, I’ll check it out!