What about all the Maseratis, Ferraris, and Lamborghinis putting out more than 300 hp? Or were they never for sale in the US? I'm talking about the Khamsin (320 hp, 4.9 V8), Bora (320 hp, 4.9 V8), Countach (375 hp, 3.9 V12), 512BB (360 hp, 4.9 F12). I need to know the context: is this discussion limited to just…

You mean name you one other company that has went bankrupt, had problems that it knew would come back to bite it in the ass but did nothing about them, AND built crappy cars for three to four decades and basically get eaten by the competition? That's an awfully tall order.

No, the ignition switch is just the latest in a long line of GM ineptitude.

This renders the SL65 almost irrelevant. The 65 needs 4MATIC and about 30 more horsepower like the 65 Black Series had.

So because they employ so many people means that they should get away with it? What are other companies doing if not employing people?

I have no idea. I think it's a rather good-looking van. The cargo version looks awesome.

The Audi was slower around the track. I've seen these journalists describe Audis as understeer-y and nose heavy. Well then, what are they good for?

Two Renaults took that record from the Cobalt.

I love those boomerang lights. I actually adore that design, even though the proportions are way off in most places (it looks very awkward when viewed from the front 3/4). It had a tiny 3.2 TT V8; much more interesting than the 4.2 Coupe model. Maserati needs more cars like this.

How on earth does this look like the first generation TT? It looks like a Silverado-esque refresh to the second generation model. From what has been revealed so far, the original TT poops all over this "new" car design wise. I can't stand Audi's stagnant design language anymore. The management deserves a slap in the…

MB offered this dark green color that it doesn't anymore. Looked really good on the 2007-2009 E-Class.