Your lack of logic is stunning. The same legal system that convicted this man, the same that these commenters describe as "broken"when it convicted Knox, is now 100% correct and there is no need to look further. The "brokenness" only rears its head when it convicts someone who doesn't look right — a white woman from…

The evidence collected by the Italian police originally pointed to Knox, and she was fairly tried and convicted. Them's the facts.

Well, given that you apparently support corrupt judicial systems when they convict people who believe "look" guilty, then I have no doubt you work in law enforcement.

The court also found Amanda Knox guilty of the murder the first time. Now you have absolute confidence in the police work when it is a black man who is being blamed? Gimme a break.

After they beat it out of him? And I thought she blamed another black man for doing this the first time? Why can't you just admit that she's a lying bitch.

That's funny because you're not taking a fine toothed comb and looking over the evidence that supposedly links this man with the crime. You already know that the Italian police and justice system can bungle things, just like they did with your precious Amanda, so now all of a sudden you think they got it right?

So basically the same evidence that they have against him is the same that was used to convict her the first time? But yet, she was "wrongly convicted"? Gimme a break.

LOL, our legal system is fucked. Did you read the DOJ report on Ferguson?

Being a book editor is not an "accomplishment". Just as easily as another poster dismissed this woman's accomplishments in the music industry, I can just as easily dismiss Jackie O's bullshit job in the book industry (which she only got because she fucked JFK).

It's fake, you morons. The only women who post to Reddit are just as real as the Gamergate mascot.

And Jackie O is looked to as an icon? The only thing she "accomplished" was dressing herself each morning.

And Jackie O is looked to as an icon? The only thing she "accomplished" was dressing herself each morning.

Like Hillary Clinton?

But the other players, as through the statement released, didn't believe a song about fucking a dead woman to be denigrating at all, so...

k

I know what "benefit of doubt" actually means, thank you. It means I'm taking his words as face value, and not trying to spin a positive outlook on them based on that one time he said he was a feminist or that he had a "pure heart" (like I know who he is personally or some shit).

That said, I am a member of the privileged class, so what the hell do I know?

We don't have any obligation to incentivize Aziz to do anything. But since the fight is about winning hearts and minds, a scorched earth approach is not well suited to getting where we want to be.

Trust me when I say it's better if well-intentioned men talk out their asses together than not discuss feminism because they're concerned they don't know enough to reasonably do so. They need to say the shit they'll later realize is stupid to somebody.